This is a discussion on Re: SNMPv3 implementation & co-existence within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On 20/09/2007, Anuradha A- TLS, Chennai. <aanuradha@hcl.in> wrote: > Is the Co-existence mib ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On 20/09/2007, Anuradha A- TLS, Chennai. <aanuradha@hcl.in> wrote:
> Is the Co-existence mib being implemented in net-snmp? What do you mean by the Co-existence MIB? Can you provide a reference? If you mean the SNMP-COMMUNITY-MIB (defined in RFC3584, the co-existence specification), then no - this MIB is not currently implemented. > If No, how is the co-existence of v1,v2c and v3 being achieved? There is an equivalent mapping between v1/2c community strings and SNMPv3-style security names - specified by the 'com2sec' directive. This was implemented privately, at around the same time as the COMMUNITY MIB was being developed. > How and where the community strings for v1 and v2c are being created and verified? > It would be of great help if somebody can explain these. See 'agent/mibgroup/mibII/vacm_conf.c' - in particular the routine 'vacm_check_view' Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders |