Re: Setting fdset for select without snmp_select_info

I already tried that. If I try to access the socket with transport->sock or=
similar (like snmp_sess_transport(ss)->sock) the application behaves in a =
very strange way. Basically every line containig transport->sock and all th=
e following code is ignored (as if a return call was placed in their place).
In this case:

unsigned int prova;
prova =3D (unsigned int) &transport->sock;
fds =3D prova +1;
//until this point the application behaves normally
FD_SET(transport->sock, &fdset);//this line and all the following code =
is ignored as if a return call was placed here
fds =3D select(fds, &fdset, 0, 0, &timeout);

I've never seen a beahvior of that kind and I don't have a clue about what'=
s causing it.

---------- Initial Header -----------

>From : net-snmp-coders-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
To : net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc : =

Date : Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:53:01 +0200 (CEST)
Subject : Re: Setting fdset for select without snmp_select_info







> On Wed, September 5, 2007 11:36 am, ozora@libero.it wrote:
> =

> > prova =3D (unsigned int) &transport->sock;
> =

> You're taking the address of the socket, not the value, then casting it to
> a uint. select wants the socket itself, not an address. Try dropping the
> &.
> =

> Pete
> =

> =

> =



------------------------------------------------------
Leggi GRATIS le tue mail con il telefonino i-mode=99 di Wind
http://i-mode.wind.it/


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders