Re: Patch 1728247 long long vs int64_t

Mitsuru Chinen wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:06:03 +0900
> Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Then, how about the attached patch?
>>
The patch fixes the long long issue, but doesn't address the
HAVE_INTMAX_T issue. As I mentioned in my original email, should we change:

typedef long long intmax_t;
typedef unsigned long long uintmax_t;

to:

typedef int64_t intmax_t;
typedef uint64_t uintmax_t;

I can test the patch and any other changes on the weekend.

Alex


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders