RE: how to purify net-snmp code

This is a discussion on RE: how to purify net-snmp code within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1380764637== Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > SNMP Coders

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2007
Devi U
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: how to purify net-snmp code

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--===============1380764637==
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C772B1.28C2EAB2"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C772B1.28C2EAB2
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=20
=20
Hi,
=20
Very Sorry for my late reply. I was assigned to other works and back to=
this problem now.
after freeing varbind, memory usage was not reduced.
=20
we are sending traps only and traps are received properly in management=
system configured.(Verified thro' Advent Net Manager - Trap viewer)
I have cross verified with other implementations and i cant find any=
problem in our implementation.
=20
Using gdb , I have identified that out of 40 K=20
1. 8K is increased in method -=20
=20
agent/agent_trap.c - send_trap_to_sess(netsnmp_session * sess,=
netsnmp_pdu *template_pdu)
=20
we are using net-snmp version 5.3.0.1 and line 881 /*=
snmp_free_pdu(pdu); */ is commented.
In net-snmp version 5.4 it is uncommented.
=20
2. 32 K ( increasing by 8 K for every call,this method is called in for=
loop ) is increased in method -=20
agent/helpers/table_dataset.c - netsnmp_set_row_column(netsnmp_table_row=
*row, unsigned int column,
int type, const char=
*value, size_t value_len)
=20
I doubt whether memory allocated and pointed to by row is freed or not.
=20
=20
Code flow to netsnmp_set_row_column=20
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
#0 netsnmp_set_row_column (row=3D0x187a8b8, column=3D3, type=3D2, value=
=3D0xffbfeb74 "", value_len=3D4)
at table_dataset.c:1224
#1 0xff2c226c in log_notification (pdu=3D0x181dfa8, transport=3D0x3408)
at notification-log-mib/notification_log.c:687
#2 0xff2bcc0c in send_notifications (major=3D2136456, minor=3D7, serverarg=
=3D0x2ffd08,
clientarg=3D0xff304fe8) at notification/snmpNotifyTable.c:260
#3 0xff15ace0 in snmp_call_callbacks (major=3D1, minor=3D7, caller_arg=
=3D0x2ffd08) at callback.c:323
#4 0xff3688b0 in netsnmp_send_traps (trap=3D-1, specific=3D-1, enterprise=
=3D0xff392a64,
enterprise_length=3D10, vars=3D0x2209320, context=3D0x0, flags=3D0) at=
agent_trap.c:783
#5 0xff3689d0 in send_enterprise_trap_vars (trap=3D-1, specific=3D-1,=
enterprise=3D0xff392a64,
enterprise_length=3D10, vars=3D0x2209320) at agent_trap.c:797
#6 0xff29d0bc in send_eventTrap_trap () at ssg/ssg.c:1349 <------ Here we=
called send_v2trap
#7 0xff15d940 in run_alarms () at snmp_alarm.c:251 =20
=20
=20
Thanx,
Devi.U

________________________________

From: santhosh.sundarasamy@wipro.com=
[mailto:santhosh.sundarasamy@wipro.com]
Sent: Wed 3/14/2007 12:08 PM
To: Devi U; net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: how to purify net-snmp code




Devi,
After freeing varbind, usage should decrease; PDU is already freed=
in netsnmp_send_traps() itself ( invoked by send_v2trap). Sending trap or=
inform? Are you receiving the traps in trapd? Cross check the API usage=
in other implementations (grep send_v2trap `find . -name "*.c"`)

We used method similar to apps/snmptrap.c and there is no memory=
usage raised / leaks. Pls refer snmptrap.c file for session creation &=
deletion.

-
Santhosh

________________________________________
From: Devi U [mailto:udevi@TechMahindra.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 7:30 PM
To: SANTHOSH S (WT01 - Broadband Networks);=
net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: how to purify net-snmp code

=20
Santhosh,
=20
Thanx for ur immediate response.
followed the same example - /examples/notification.c
=20
snmp_free_varbind is called in our code after send_v2trap().
=20
In top output, i can see the size remains same even after=
snmp_free_varbind() is called.should size decrease after free is called?
=20
For every 100 msec, callback will be called,snmp_varlist_add_variable() is=
used to store the variables and send_v2trap() is called for sending a=
single trap.
=20
I dont know how to create session / send all traps in a single session.
=20
Thanx,
Devi.U
________________________________________
From: santhosh.sundarasamy@wipro.com=
[mailto:santhosh.sundarasamy@wipro.com]
Sent: Tue 3/13/2007 7:03 PM
To: Devi U; net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: how to purify net-snmp code

Hi Devi,
The increase shown in top is memory usage by the application; all=
increased bytes might have not been leaked.

You need to free the varbinds after sending each trap/inform.
snmp_free_varbind(notification_vars);
refer:=
http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/agent/no...c-example.html =20

Print the "top" output after freeing varbind and check the usage.

Are you using single session to send all trap/inform or creating=
session before sending each inform/trap?

-
Santhosh
________________________________________
From: Devi U [mailto:udevi@TechMahindra.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 6:44 PM
To: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: SANTHOSH S (WT01 - Broadband Networks)
Subject: RE: how to purify net-snmp code

Hi,
=20
thanx santhosh..
I am able to purify the code..
=20
I feel that memory leak is there when send_v2trap is called, but i am not=
getting any MLK/PLK in traces
=20
top display:
=20
26760 root 1 0 19 9248K 5608K run 0:01 0.30% snmpd
=20
top display after a trap is sent =3D=3D=3D> for each trap sent there is a=
increase of 40K in SIZE and goes upto 50M.
26760 root 1 0 19 9288K 5648K run 0:01 0.31% snmpd
=20
we are using net-snmp version 5.3.0.1.
=20
whether above increase in SIZE is memory leak?
=20
Thanx,
Devi.U


The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to=
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and=
may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you=
are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or=
copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all=
copies of this message and any attachments.

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient=
should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.=
The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus=
transmitted by this email.

www.wipro.com


The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to=
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and=
may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you=
are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or=
copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all=
copies of this message and any attachments.

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient=
should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.=
The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus=
transmitted by this email.

www.wipro.com




=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Tech Mahindra, formerly Mahindra-British Telecom.
=20
Disclaimer:

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and=
confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may=
review at <a href=
=3D"http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html">http://www.techmahindra.co=
m/Disclaimer.html</a> externally and <a href=
=3D"http://tim.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html">http://tim.techmahindra.co=
m/Disclaimer.html</a> internally within Tech Mahindra.

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
------_=_NextPart_001_01C772B1.28C2EAB2
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; charset=
=3Diso-8859-1">
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7638.1">
<TITLE>RE: how to purify net-snmp code</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=3DidOWAReplyText47319 dir=3Dltr>
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=
=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=3Dltr>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Very Sorry for my late reply. I was=
assigned to=20
other works and back to this problem now.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>after freeing varbind, memory usage was=
not=20
reduced.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>we are sending traps only and traps are=
received=20
properly in management system configured.(Verified thro' Advent Net Manager=
=20
-&nbsp;Trap viewer)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have cross verified with other=
implementations=20
and i cant find any problem in our implementation.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Using gdb&nbsp; , I have identified that=
out of 40=20
K </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>1. 8K is increased in method -=
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; agent/agent_trap.c -=20
send_trap_to_sess(netsnmp_session * sess, netsnmp_pdu=20
*template_pdu)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; we are using net-snmp version=
5.3.0.1=20
and line 881 /* snmp_free_pdu(pdu); */ is commented.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; In net-snmp version 5.4 it is=
=20
uncommented.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>2. 32 K ( increasing by 8 K for every=
call,this=20
method is called in for loop )&nbsp; is increased in method - </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; agent/helpers/<FONT face=
=3DArial=20
size=3D2>table_dataset.c - </FONT>netsnmp_set_row_column(netsnmp_table_row=
*row,=20
unsigned int=20
column,<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nb sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&=
nbsp;=20
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nb=
sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp ;&nbsp;=20
int type, const char *value, size_t value_len)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; I doubt whether memory=20
allocated&nbsp;and pointed to by&nbsp;row is freed or not.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Code flow&nbsp;to netsnmp_set_row_column=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>#0&nbsp; netsnmp_set_row_column (row=
=3D0x187a8b8,=20
column=3D3, type=3D2, value=3D0xffbfeb74 "", value_len=
=3D4)<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; at=20
table_dataset.c:1224<BR>#1&nbsp; 0xff2c226c in log_notification (pdu=
=3D0x181dfa8,=20
transport=3D0x3408)<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; at=20
notification-log-mib/notification_log.c:687<BR>#2&nbsp; 0xff2bcc0c in=20
send_notifications (major=3D2136456, minor=3D7,=20
serverarg=3D0x2ffd08,<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; clientarg=3D0xff304fe8) at=20
notification/snmpNotifyTable.c:260<BR>#3&nbsp; 0xff15ace0 in=
snmp_call_callbacks=20
(major=3D1, minor=3D7, caller_arg=3D0x2ffd08) at callback.c:323<BR>#4&nbsp;=
0xff3688b0=20
in netsnmp_send_traps (trap=3D-1, specific=3D-1,=20
enterprise=3D0xff392a64,<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; enterprise_length=3D10,=20
vars=3D0x2209320, context=3D0x0, flags=3D0) at agent_trap.c:783<BR>#5&nbsp;=
0xff3689d0=20
in send_enterprise_trap_vars (trap=3D-1, specific=3D-1,=20
enterprise=3D0xff392a64,<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; enterprise_length=3D10,=20
vars=3D0x2209320) at agent_trap.c:797<BR>#6&nbsp; <STRONG>0xff29d0bc in=20
send_eventTrap_trap () at ssg/ssg.c:1349 &lt;------ Here we&nbsp;called=20
send_v2trap<BR></STRONG>#7&nbsp; 0xff15d940 in run_alarms () at=20
snmp_alarm.c:251&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanx,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Devi.U</FONT></DIV><BR>
<HR tabIndex=3D-1>
<FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>From:</B> santhosh.sundarasamy@wipro.com=20
[mailto:santhosh.sundarasamy@wipro.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wed 3/14/2007 12:08=
=20
PM<BR><B>To:</B> Devi U;=20
net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: how to purify=
=20
net-snmp code<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Devi,<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n bsp;&nbsp; After=
=20
freeing varbind, usage should decrease; PDU is already freed in=20
netsnmp_send_traps() itself ( invoked by send_v2trap). Sending trap or=
inform?=20
Are you receiving the traps in trapd?&nbsp; Cross check the API usage in=
other=20
implementations (grep send_v2trap `find . -name=20
"*.c"`)<BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp ;&nbsp; We used method=
similar=20
to apps/snmptrap.c and there is no memory usage raised / leaks. Pls refer=20
snmptrap.c file for session creation &amp;=20
deletion.<BR><BR>-<BR>Santhosh<BR><BR>______________________________ _______=
___<BR>From:=20
Devi U [<A=20
href=
=3D"mailto:udevi@TechMahindra.com">mailto:udevi@Te chMahindra.com</A>]<BR>Se=
nt:=20
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 7:30 PM<BR>To: SANTHOSH S (WT01 - Broadband=
Networks);=20
net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net<BR>Subject: RE: how to purify=
net-snmp=20
code<BR><BR>&nbsp;<BR>Santhosh,<BR>&nbsp;<BR>Thanx for ur immediate=20
response.<BR>followed the same example -=20
/examples/notification.c<BR>&nbsp;<BR>snmp_free_varbind is called in our=20
code&nbsp;after send_v2trap().<BR>&nbsp;<BR>In top output, i can see the=
size=20
remains same even after snmp_free_varbind() is called.should size decrease=
after=20
free is called?<BR>&nbsp;<BR>For every 100 msec, callback will be=20
called,snmp_varlist_add_variable() is used to&nbsp;store the=
variables&nbsp;and=20
send_v2trap() is called for sending a single trap.<BR>&nbsp;<BR>I dont know=
how=20
to create session&nbsp;/ send all traps in a single=20
session.<BR>&nbsp;<BR>Thanx,<BR>Devi.U<BR>________ _________________________=
_______<BR>From:=20
santhosh.sundarasamy@wipro.com [<A=20
href=
=3D"mailto:santhosh.sundarasamy@wipro.com">mailto: santhosh.sundarasamy@wipr=
o.com</A>]<BR>Sent:=20
Tue 3/13/2007 7:03 PM<BR>To: Devi U;=20
net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net<BR>Subject: RE: how to purify=
net-snmp=20
code<BR><BR>Hi Devi,<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp ; The=
increase=20
shown in top is memory usage by the application; all increased bytes might=
have=20
not been leaked.<BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp ;&nbsp; You need=
to=20
free the varbinds after sending each=20
trap/inform.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nb sp;=20
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
snmp_free_varbind(notification_vars);<BR>&nbsp;&nb sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;=20
refer: <A=20
href=
=3D"http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/agent/notification_8c-example.html">http://=
www.net-snmp.org/dev/agent/notification_8c-example.html</A>=20
&nbsp;<BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; Print the "top"=
output=20
after freeing varbind and check the=20
usage.<BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; Are you using=
single=20
session to send all trap/inform or creating session before sending each=20
inform/trap?<BR><BR>-<BR>Santhosh<BR>__________________________________ ____=
__<BR>From:=20
Devi U [<A=20
href=
=3D"mailto:udevi@TechMahindra.com">mailto:udevi@Te chMahindra.com</A>]<BR>Se=
nt:=20
Tuesday, March 13, 2007 6:44 PM<BR>To:=20
net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net<BR>Cc: SANTHOSH S (WT01 - Broadband=20
Networks)<BR>Subject: RE: how to purify net-snmp=20
code<BR><BR>Hi,<BR>&nbsp;<BR>thanx santhosh..<BR>I am able to purify the=20
code..<BR>&nbsp;<BR>I feel that&nbsp;memory leak is there when send_v2trap=
is=20
called, but i am not getting any MLK/PLK&nbsp;&nbsp;in=
traces<BR>&nbsp;<BR>top=20
display:<BR>&nbsp;<BR>26760 root&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
1&nbsp;&nbsp; 0&nbsp;&nbsp; 19 9248K 5608K run&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
0:01&nbsp; 0.30% snmpd<BR>&nbsp;<BR>top display after a trap is sent =3D=3D=
=3D&gt; for=20
each&nbsp; trap sent there is a increase of 40K in SIZE and goes upto=20
50M.<BR>26760 root&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
0&nbsp;&nbsp; 19 9288K 5648K run&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0:01&nbsp; 0.31%=20
snmpd<BR>&nbsp;<BR>we are using net-snmp version=
5.3.0.1.<BR>&nbsp;<BR>whether=20
above increase in SIZE is memory=20
leak?<BR>&nbsp;<BR>Thanx,<BR>Devi.U<BR><BR><BR>The information contained in=
this=20
electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the=
=20
exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential=
or=20
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should=
not=20
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender=20
immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any=20
attachments.<BR><BR>WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email.=
The=20
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of=20
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any=
virus=20
transmitted by this email.<BR><BR>www.wipro.com<BR><BR><BR>The information=
=20
contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message=
are=20
intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain=
proprietary,=20
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended=
recipient,=20
you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify=
the=20
sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any=20
attachments.<BR><BR>WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email.=
The=20
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of=20
viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any=
virus=20
transmitted by this=20
email.<BR><BR>www.wipro.com<BR></FONT></P></DIV>

</BODY>
</HTML>
<table><tr><td bgcolor=3D#ffffff><font color=3D#000000>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D<br>
<br>
Tech Mahindra, formerly Mahindra-British Telecom.<br>
<br>
Disclaimer:<br>
<br>
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and=
confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may=
review at <a href=
=3D"http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html">http://www.techmahindra.co=
m/Disclaimer.html</a> externally and <a href=
=3D"http://tim.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html">http://tim.techmahindra.co=
m/Disclaimer.html</a> internally within Tech Mahindra.<br>
<br>
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D<br>
</font></td></tr></table>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C772B1.28C2EAB2--



--===============1380764637==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?p...rge&CID=DEVDEV
--===============1380764637==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders

--===============1380764637==--


Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0