This is a discussion on RE: IPv6 support not enabled on Solaris 9 when building Net-SNMP_5.3.1 within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Hi, Contents of snmpd.conf file =========================== rocommunity SNMP_COMMUNITY-1 rwcommunity SNMP_COMMUNITY-2 rocommunity6 SNMP_COMMUNITY-61 rwcommunity6 SNMP_COMMUNITY-62 Starting of ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Hi,
Contents of snmpd.conf file =========================== rocommunity SNMP_COMMUNITY-1 rwcommunity SNMP_COMMUNITY-2 rocommunity6 SNMP_COMMUNITY-61 rwcommunity6 SNMP_COMMUNITY-62 Starting of snmpd ----------------- ../snmpd -d -f -Le -Dnetsnmp_udp6 udp:161,udp6:1161 Output of netstat -a -P udp =========================== UDP: IPv4 Local Address Remote Address State -------------------- -------------------- ------- .... *.snmp Idle *.1161 Idle .... UDP: IPv6 Local Address Remote Address State -------------------- -------------------- ------- *.1161 Idle Command Execution ================= IPv6: % snmpget -v1 -c SNMP_COMMUNITY-61 'udp6:[fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645]:1161' sysName.0 Timeout: No Response from udp6:[fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645]:1161 Output On Agent Console ======================= netsnmp_udp6: fmtaddr: t = 0, data = 2297c8, len = 32 netsnmp_udp6: recvfrom fd 6 got 54 bytes (from UDP/IPv6: [fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645]:-22606) netsnmp_udp6: fmtaddr: t = 23a460, data = 2297c8, len = 32 Received 54 bytes from UDP/IPv6: [fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645]:-22606 0000: 30 34 02 01 00 04 11 53 4E 4D 50 5F 43 4F 4D 4D 04.....SNMP_COMM 0016: 55 4E 49 54 59 2D 36 31 A0 1C 02 04 49 D9 6C 6E UNITY-61....I.ln 0032: 02 01 00 02 01 00 30 0E 30 0C 06 08 2B 06 01 02 ......0.0...+... 0048: 01 01 05 00 05 00 ...... netsnmp_udp6: fmtaddr: t = 23a460, data = 2297c8, len = 32 Received SNMP packet(s) from UDP/IPv6: [fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645]:-22606 GET message -- SNMPv2-MIB::sysName.0 netsnmp_udp6_getSecName: resolve <"SNMP_COMMUNITY-61", fe80::203:baff:fe2a:a645> netsnmp_udp6_getSecName: compare <"SNMP-COMMUNITY-61", 0x/0x000000000000000000000000ffbfed00>... nope netsnmp_udp6_getSecName: compare <"SNMP_COMMUNITY-62", 0x/0x000000000000000000000000ffbfed00>... nope (repeats for retries...) Sincerely, Rahul K -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Anders [mailto:thomas.anders@blue-cable.de] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 2:03 PM To: rahul_k_sharma@agilent.com Cc: D.T.Shield@csc.liv.ac.uk; net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net; sunil_ak@agilent.com Subject: Re: IPv6 support not enabled on Solaris 9 when building Net-SNMP_5.3.1 rahul_k_sharma@agilent.com wrote: > ./snmpd -d -p udp:161,udp6:1161 Why "-p"? This option is meant to be used for -p FILE store process id in FILE which means that "udp:161,udp6:1161" would be treated as a filename rather than a transport identifier. Please try again with ../snmpd -d -f -Le -Dnetsnmp_udp6 udp:161,udp6:1161 > UDP: IPv6 > Local Address Remote Address State > -------------------- -------------------- ------- ... > (*.snmp NOT PRESENT) In the netstat output, look for "1161" rather than *.snmp for IPv6 because you've started it on a non-default port! If it still fails, post the output of the agent. If it isn't helpful enough, run snmpd under gdb and step through snmplib/snmpUDPIPv6Domain.c to find out where it fails. +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=...057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|