This is a discussion on Re: access control and non-default contexts within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Wes Hardaker wrote: > DS> I'm inclined to leave things as they stand - this feels a more secure &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Wes Hardaker wrote:
> DS> I'm inclined to leave things as they stand - this feels a more secure > DS> arrangement, and is probably in line with default expectations. > I actually think it should authorize all by default. That's what it's > done before and it's a behavior change. I'm on the fence and have certain sympathy for both arguments. As such, I'd tend to let backward compatibility win (the easy way, saving me from config changes myself), unless someone convinces me differently. +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=...057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders |