This is a discussion on Re: rfc: add/remove warnings for 5.4? within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; >>>>> "DS" == Dave Shield <D.T.Shield@csc.liv.ac.uk> writes: ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
>>>>> "DS" == Dave Shield <D.T.Shield@csc.liv.ac.uk> writes:
DS> I believe we'd agreed to keep shipping the "ucd-snmp/extensible" DS> module code, so individual admins could configure it into the agent DS> (and restore the previous behaviour) - but we'd drop it from the DS> default build. DS> Is now the right time to make that change? I'm happy to do so, but DS> feel we probably ought to have a clear agreement over this, rather DS> than me trying to slip it in unnoticed. I think it's the right time, yes. I'd be tempted to put a warning somewhere during read_config time that would catch the unsupported tokens and print a warning saying what they had to do to recompile it for that support. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=...057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders |