Re: adding rfcs to distribution

On 27/07/06, Robert Story <rstory@freesnmp.com> wrote:
> DS> The full RFCs, rather than just the MIB files, you mean?
>
> Actually, it's just the RFCs for the protocol/smi, I think. Not any of the MIB
> RFCs.
>
> Do you think we should include MIB RFCs too?

Let's start with the protocol RFCs.
We can add other RFCs later if we feel it would be useful.


> DS> I'd vote for putting these under 'docs' - there's too much at the top
> DS> level already. I wouldn't want to see this cluttered up any more.
>
> I agree 100%. I'd be ok w/doc, but have a slight preference for docs.

I'd forgotten that we don't already have a docs (or doc) directory.
I don't really care about the name - maybe a slight preference for docs.

But I'd like to move some of the existing documentation away from the top level.
Maybe keep the "core" information files (NEWS, README, FAQ), but move
the rest of them into docs too.

Dave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?p...rge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders