Re: version managment

darix wrote:
> as the SF.net CVS is still/again unstable, i would like to suggest
> moving to svn.

Seconded. Wes has always argued that the users should decide which I
tend to agree to. Now that SF.net is offering SVN services officially,
the poll is overdue.

> Advantages I see for the move:

Not to mention "renaming" (while keeping history). Here are some more
(random) articles on SVN vs. CVS:

http://www.linux.ie/articles/subversion/
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/010au...es/subversion/

Get ready to make your choice.


+Thomas

--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=...057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders