This is a discussion on Re: Maximum size of GETBULK ! within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 22:20 +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 22:20 +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:38:05AM -0500, Robert Story wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:29:54 -0600 Rajnish wrote: Rajnish> What is the maximum size of PDU Robert> 65k Magnus> Is this limit mandated by standards Yes - though it seems to be implicit rather than stated explicitly. For example: RFC 1906: Section 3.1 "Each instance of a message is serialized ... onto a single UDP datagram ..." (and repeated in RFC 3417) RFC 768: Fields "Length [a 16-bit value] is the length in octets of this user datagram ..." So a UDP datagram cannot be larger than 65K, which means an SNMP PDU (at least when using the standard UDP transport) cannot either. It's not immediately clear whether the same limit holds for the other transports discussed in RFC 1906/3417. They also talk about the mess fitting into "a single datagram", but you'd need to check the relevant transport specs to see what limits this would imply. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders |