This is a discussion on Re: sub tables in MIB within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 13:39 -0500, Chris Fowler wrote: > Here is what I've got working ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 13:39 -0500, Chris Fowler wrote:
> Here is what I've got working so far: > --- > --- Sensor Devices > --- [snip] > opsSrenaSensorIndex OBJECT-TYPE > SYNTAX Integer32 > MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS not-accessible [snip] > --- > --- Channels off Sensors > --- > opsSrenaSensorChannelEntry OBJECT-TYPE > SYNTAX OpsSrenaSensorChannelEntry > MAX-ACCESS not-accessible > STATUS current > DESCRIPTION > "Information about a particular sensor channel." > > INDEX { opsSrenaSensorChannelIndex } INDEX { opsSrenaSensorIndex, opsSrenaSensorChannelIndex } > opsSrenaSensorChannelIndex OBJECT-TYPE > SYNTAX Integer32 > MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS not-accessible > opsSrenaSensorChannelSensor OBJECT-TYPE > DESCRIPTION > "Index into the sensor table > channel belongs to." This object is not necessary - drop it. (See the INDEX clause above). The table for alarms would be handled similarly - indexed by a (opsSrenaSensorIndex, opsSrenaChannelIndex, opsSrenaAlarmIndex) triplet, with only the last being an (inaccessible) object in the opsSrenaAlarmTable. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders |