This is a discussion on Re: trapd authorization hacks (again) within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; >>>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:19:31 +0100, Dave Shield <D.T.Shield@...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:19:31 +0100, Dave Shield <D.T.Shield@csc.liv.ac.uk> said:
Dave> In particular, it must be possible (and *trivial*) to restore Dave> the current open behaviour. So this probably means a one-line Dave> configure directive to allow anything from anywhere. (And Dave> clearly documented as such in as many places as possible). I agree with that. And it would be trivial to do. Dave> I realise that this is probably anathema to the security people, Dave> but as a Network Administrator with Very Little Time, I'd wouldn't Dave> expect a new release to "break" my currently working setup, without Dave> an easy way to fix it again. No, I very much understand the need to run an insecure network. Security takes time and energy and it's not until it's too late do people want to spend that time and energy. People *should* be able to do what they want, and if they want to do something insecurely that is fine. Where tools get it wrong much of the time is: 1) not doing something strict by default 2) what you said: not making it easy to configure it the way people want Dave> Another Question: what timescale are you looking at? Dave> It's obviously not relevant to 5.2.2, so are we talking Dave> about squeezing this into 5.3, or waiting until 5.4 ? I won't let 5.3 go out the door without it. Period. What's out there now is simply bad. But I should also have the time to get it done by 5.3, assuming I can reuse the infrastructure that we have today which I think fits anyway. Dave> I'm concerned that we might rush something in too hastily, and Dave> be forced to live with the consequences. Wes - is this code Dave> that you've already got waiting to be committed, or are you Dave> talking about developing something new? It's almost entirely working. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders |