Re: solaris*.h

Bruce Shaw wrote:
> I already tried it. Nothing broke that I could discover at least under
> Solaris 10 and 11, which was the point of this whole discussion.

It was the *starting* point of the discussion, but we're now also
discussing (for 5.3) whether/how to rework solaris*.h entirely.

As for "nothing broke": did you look *especially* at the affected MIB
module's objects? The changes may be subtle or even not be user-visible
under all circumstances, but these setting will quite likely at least
cause the agent to follow different code paths.

> WH>There are something things that it'll be hard to test for under
> WH>configure because it requires root privileges to do the test... Also
> WH>it's possible that we may simply not want to do some things because
> WH>they're broken under one functionality (which rings bells for me).
>
> I couldn't even find anyplace where they actually linked.

I don't understand that sentence. Can you try again, please?


+Thomas

--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders