Re: undocumented config tokens
This is a discussion on Re: undocumented config tokens within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; >>>>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:43:48 +0200, Thomas Anders <thomas.anders@blue-...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
06-30-2005
|
|||
|
|||
Re: undocumented config tokens
>>>>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:43:48 +0200, Thomas Anders <thomas.anders@blue-cable.de> said:
Thomas> Shouldn't we align 5.1.x to also accept "AES" (=AES128) and fully Thomas> document "AES" (at various places) for 5.[12].x? Yeah, I'd think so. I don't think we should drop the AES128 and other identifiers from that series, but we should at least support a straight AES token. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders 
|
Linear Mode
