Re: automated build/testing?

Wes Hardaker wrote:
>>>>>>On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:28:14 +0100, Dave Shield <D.T.Shield@csc.liv.ac.uk> said:
>
> Weighing in late:
>
> I'd vote for -testing with an auto-subscribe of everyone on admin. If
> they want to remove themselves, thats fine.
>
> I don't think forcing people on testing permanently is necessarily
> right unless they're either the release manager or working in that
> tree. If you want to get really picky and write lots of code, mail
> anyone who has posted code to that branch in the last 7 days or
> something. Heh. But that would be more pain to implement than is
> worth it.

Not too uncommon, in fact, and no need to write lots of additional code
either. "buildbot" supports this out of the box: see the "blamelist"
feature on

http://buildbot.sourceforge.net/PyCo...bot.html#auto2


+Thomas

--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders