This is a discussion on Re: rfc: excluding debug output within the SNMP Coders forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:36:40 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> Well, we could always extend that MIB ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:36:40 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> Well, we could always extend that MIB to add an extra column DS> (included/excluded) - presumably defaulting to included. Fine by me, on both counts. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders |