Re: rfc: changing default callback priority

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:28:13 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> Robert> It is an integer, so it would allow negative numbers. If it's
WH> Robert> common, then that might be an argument for just leaving it as
WH> Robert> is.
WH>
WH> That's probably what I'd do. There is no reason, IMHO, not to and in
WH> fact it helps compatibility...

Ok. I just added some macros for highest, default and lowest level. I just used
-1024, 0 and 1024, instead of using the full int range.. should be enough, and
limitations are not enforces if someone wants to exceed them.

--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.

Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders