Re: rfc: changing default callback priority

>>>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:48:19 -0400, Robert Story <rstory@freesnmp.com> said:

WH> 2) does the current API allow for negative numbers in the API, or is
WH> unsigned currently? I don't see a problem with negative numbers.
WH> negative numbers for priority levels are actually quiet common in
WH> API sets. unix-nice, iptables, etc all have negative numbers for
WH> priority levels and it's common.

Robert> It is an integer, so it would allow negative numbers. If it's
Robert> common, then that might be an argument for just leaving it as
Robert> is.

That's probably what I'd do. There is no reason, IMHO, not to and in
fact it helps compatibility...

--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders