RE: IPv6 testing

I tested from our management application without giving udp6 and port number
and it works fine. So, the requirement of giving udp6 is of "snmpget" and
not the agents.

- Srini

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:hardaker@users.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 10:54 AM
> To: Srini Kode
> Cc: net-snmp-coders-admin@lists.sourceforge.net;
> net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net; rstory@freesnmp.com
> Subject: Re: IPv6 testing
>
> >>>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:00:13 -0800, "Srini Kode"
> <skode@cisco.com> said:
>
> Srini> snmpget -v 2c -D All -c public
> udp6:[fe80::205:30ff:fe00:2309]161
> Srini> sysDescr.0
>
> Srini> This means the network management application must
> give udp6 and
> Srini> the port number number 161 also when they query. Is
> this the standard practice?
> Srini> Just like IPv4 why cannot we just have the ip address in the
> Srini> request?
>
> Our applications require the usage of specialized strings for
> determining which transport to us. Every management
> application will likely do something different.
>
> Actually, I think you can drop much of the above as the port
> number and the udp6 identifier portions will be figured out
> if you don't include them. But this is from memory of how I
> remember it being implemented. I haven't looked at the code
> or tested it to make sure what I'm saying is the truth ;-)
>
> --
> Wes Hardaker
> Sparta
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders