Re: IPv6 testing

>>>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:00:13 -0800, "Srini Kode" <skode@cisco.com> said:

Srini> snmpget -v 2c -D All -c public udp6:[fe80::205:30ff:fe00:2309]161 sysDescr.0

Srini> This means the network management application must give udp6 and the port
Srini> number number 161 also when they query. Is this the standard practice?
Srini> Just like IPv4 why cannot we just have the ip address in the
Srini> request?

Our applications require the usage of specialized strings for
determining which transport to us. Every management application will
likely do something different.

Actually, I think you can drop much of the above as the port number
and the udp6 identifier portions will be figured out if you don't
include them. But this is from memory of how I remember it being
implemented. I haven't looked at the code or tested it to make sure
what I'm saying is the truth ;-)

--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders