Re: Help wanted Regarding SNMPTRAP (URGENT)

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:05:53 -0800 (PST) gg wrote:
GG> The ICMP response usually indicates that nothing is
GG> listening to the port (in this case 162).

netstat should be able to report if port 162 has anyone listening.

GG> I am guessing that snmptrapd only sends traps and does not
GG> listen for incoming traps

Actually, it's exactly the opposite. It only listens for traps, and does not
send them. An no configuration is needed to listen for traps.

--
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>

You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/...et-snmp-coders