This is a discussion on WG: WG: [Samba] Strange!!! Clients only log on to samba bdc within the Samba forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Ist there no one concerning this behaviour? I did my setup following the man pages. There must be a serious ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Ist there no one concerning this behaviour?
I did my setup following the man pages. There must be a serious bug in samba 3.031. Daniel -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Daniel Müller [mailto:mueller@tropenklinik.de] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. September 2008 10:11 An: 'samba@lists.samba.org' Betreff: WG: WG: [Samba] Strange!!! Clients only log on to samba bdc When I stop the BDC all clients log on to the PDC. And to my confusion when I restarted the BDC today and made a testparm on both PDC and BDC both showd role domain pdc --> Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC Here my smb.confs: PDC: [global] security=user smb ports = 139 logon script = logon.bat logon path = \\%L\%U\profile\%U logon drive = S: domain logons = Yes os level = 254 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins server = 192.168.135.150 #this is a smbd4wins server running on the same machine BDC: [global] security=user smb ports = 139 logon script = logon.bat logon path = \\%L\%U\profile\%U logon drive = S: domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = Yes domain master = No wins server = 192.168.135.150 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Michael Heydon [mailto:michaelh@jaswin.com.au] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. September 2008 09:46 An: mueller@tropenklinik.de Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: Re: WG: [Samba] Strange!!! Clients only log on to samba bdc Daniel Müller wrote: > Suddenly all clients log on to my BDC not longer to the PDC. > What happens if the BDC is unavailable (You could simulate this by setting up iptables rules to drop all traffic from a given workstation)? The way I understand it, workstations will use what ever DC is "closest" to them. If the PDC is taking longer to respond or something then they may consider the BDC to be the best choice. *Michael Heydon - IT Administrator * michaelh@jaswin.com.au <mailto:michaelh@jaswin.com.au> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba |
|
|||
|
> Ist there no one concerning this behaviour?
> I did my setup following the man pages. > There must be a serious bug in samba 3.031. As I understand it, clients will prefer logging on to a BDC over a PDC, and then use whichever responds quickest, so certainly all the clients should not be logging in to one box or other - and probably least likely to log on to the PDC of the two options. I know that we see about a 60/40 split logins to BDC/PDC. I don't think you should have domain master = yes set on the BDC. Here's the settings from my BDC [global] netbios name = CORE02 server string = Longhill BDC (%v,%h) workgroup = LONGHILL interfaces = 10.108.1.8/255.255.255.0 name resolve order = host bcast wins os level = 65 domain master = no domain logons = yes local master = no preferred master = no guest ok = yes wins server = 10.108.1.32 Hope that helps Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba |