Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

Re: [Samba] Help: justification for Linux PDC vs Windows...

This is a discussion on Re: [Samba] Help: justification for Linux PDC vs Windows... within the Samba forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; JJB > Yan Seiner wrote: >> Yup. For small-ish networks, nt4 servers are 'good enough'. >> >&...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > Samba

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008
Yan Seiner
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [Samba] Help: justification for Linux PDC vs Windows...


JJB
> Yan Seiner wrote:


>> Yup. For small-ish networks, nt4 servers are 'good enough'.
>>
>> Last I checked, MS imposes an artificial limit on its servers, where a
>> server can only serve its own subnet. Samba doesn't have this limit.
>> So
>> a single multi-homed samba server can do the work of several MS servers.
>>
>> So you don't need AD with samba as much since everything is on one
>> server
>> anyway whereas with MS you need multiple servers and all the management
>> overhead that entails.
>>
>> I could be wrong on this; it was true the last time I ripped out a bunch
>> of MS servers and replaced them with samba. This was some time ago....
>> Anyone know if it's still a limitation?
>>
>>

>
> As I understand it, you need a WINS server for every subnet - we figured
> this out after the fact, so we now have 3 servers running Samba so that
> everyone can see all members of the workgroups (we are rolling out the
> domain slowly - in the meanwhile, we don't want to lose functionality.
> If anyone has a written proceedure for how to get this working with only
> one multi-homed server (does that mean one server with 1 network card
> for each subnet, or one card with 3 addresses somehow associated with
> it?) please post a link or email it to me.


It's been a while, so bear with me.

You assign multiple IP addresses to your ethernet card:

ifconfig eth0 192.168.128.1
ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.129.1
ifconfig eth0:2 192.168.130.1

and so on. You can also do this through your distro's network configuration.

Then in smb.conf you tell samba to listen on those interfaces.

I think that's it. You end up with one workgroup that different subnets
can see.

If you want different workgroups I think you can run multiple samba
daemons with different interfaces set up and different workgroup names.
You'd probably have to separate out all of the volatile files like *tbd,
but I can't say. As long as the IP addresses are different this should
not cause problems.

ISTR I had to do some voodoo with wins forwarding but that may be because
I had remote servers connected via VPN.

Not written down in any detail but perhaps others can fill in.

--
Windows is like a canary in a coal mine, it's the first thing to die on
your network.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0