Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

[Samba] Expected transfer rate of samba, SATA over gigabit to SATA

This is a discussion on [Samba] Expected transfer rate of samba, SATA over gigabit to SATA within the Samba forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; What is a good transfer rate to expect when writing from Windows XP/Vista to a samba network share in ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > Samba

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008
darlingm
 
Posts: n/a
Default [Samba] Expected transfer rate of samba, SATA over gigabit to SATA


What is a good transfer rate to expect when writing from Windows XP/Vista to
a samba network share in the following situation?

* New client. Intel Core 2 Duo 6600 with 4GB memory, and Intel gigabit NIC.
* New server. HP XW8400 with (currently) a single 5335 Xeon with 4GB
memory, and integrated Intel gigabit. Running samba 3.0.25b, as included
with CentOS (RHEL).
* Netgear GS116 (gigabit) switch

Using TTCP (on Windows PCATTCP) I get around 406Mbit/sec (50.75MB/sec)
between the new client and new server. TTCP transfers random data between
two computers, to purely test the network transfer rate -- not using either
computer's hard drive whatsoever. This seems about right. From what I've
read elsewhere, it appears gigabit typically performs at about 40% of it's
theoretical transfer rate of 1000Mbit/sec unless very expensive switches and
NICs are purchased.

Using hdparm, I get around 640Mbit/sec (80MB/sec) on both the client's SATA
drive and the new server's SATA drive.

Transferring a 700MB AVI file from Windows to the samba network share runs
between 75Mbit/sec to 280Mbit/sec (9.4MB/sec to 35MB/sec), ranging wildly. I
am not sure why some of the files sometimes transfer so much slower than
others. I have all other network traffic stopped, and am transferring
different AVI files each time to eliminate a possibility of the client
machine caching the file in memory -- since I have noticed that transferring
a file a second time right after the first time often runs much faster.

I set up vsftpd as a temporary test, and transferring 700MB AVI files from
Windows to the new server by ftp runs between 67Mbit/sec and 115Mbit/sec
(8.4MB/sec to 14.4MB/sec).


Transfers to my old server of large files were often around 92Mbit/sec
(11.5MB/sec). I was hoping to see a huge increase moving to the new server,
because the old server ran a slow RAID5 of IDE drives, which hdparm only
showed a 256Mbit/sec (32MB/sec) read rate from -- and the new server runs
(currently) a single SATA drive which hdparm shows a 640Mbit/sec (80MB/sec)
read rate from, just like the client's hdparm results on a SATA drive.


One of the new server's functions is to provide a backup service for
customer machines. We copy the entire contents of a customer's hard drive to
this backup volume temporarily. Should I be expecting to get (for large
files) greater transfer rates than I am getting, or to go faster do I need
to install a hot swap bay into the new server to transfer a customer's hard
drive into?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Expected-trans...p16261586.html
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0