This is a discussion on Re: [Samba] lilesystem size limit samba on 64bit 2.6 kernel vs. within the Samba forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On 2/14/06, Michael Will <mwill@penguincomputing.com> wrote: > I had an incredibly hard time finding ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On 2/14/06, Michael Will <mwill@penguincomputing.com> wrote:
> I had an incredibly hard time finding any documentation on filesystem siz= e > limits for samba on 64bit linux with 2.6 kernel exporting to 32bit window= s 2003 > and windows-xp by googling. > > The closest I could get to was that cifs filesystem size correlates to nt= fs > filesystem size and therefore there would be a 64TB limit. Are there addi= tional > limits within the software stack that I should be aware of? Possibly. I've exported a virtual 1PB filesystem to windows clients and the= y appeared to handle it ok. > We are considering exporting a 40TB xfs filesystem striped over 20 2TB lu= ns on a > fibre channel SAN via LVM2 on SLES9-SP3, and will be falling back to 16TB > filesystems if necessary. Anything below that would be cumbersome because= of the > amount of mountpoints. XFS will handle this just fine. Be aware that xfs_repair may take a fair amount of time and memory on very large filesystems. IIRC there was some scaling work done recently, but I'm not sure if it made SP3. > Can the 32bit windows clients keep up with that size as long as the files= on the > filesystem are not larger than 4GB? I've never seen modern windows clients have problems with large files of filesystems. I don't expect you will have problems. -- James Peach | jorgar@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba |