Bluehost.com Web Hosting $6.95

RE: [Samba] Overloaded samba server. Is it a bug?

This is a discussion on RE: [Samba] Overloaded samba server. Is it a bug? within the Samba forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; I am running Suse 9.2 Pro in a corporate environment with 3.0.14a and it works great. CentOS ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > Samba

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2005
MJBarber@Hearst.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: [Samba] Overloaded samba server. Is it a bug?

I am running Suse 9.2 Pro in a corporate environment with 3.0.14a and it
works great.
CentOS is nice as well but I see no problem with Suse.

Just my 0.02...

If you truly think this is a samba problem try a different version to
either replicate the issue or to have it point to a different piece of the
puzzle. What is your complete config?

You said the load went sky high in a matter of seconds...do you see which
process is running wild (smbd, nmbd, winbindd...).


Good luck,
Michael Barber
WPTZ/WNNE
Computer Services Administrator.

-----Original Message-----
From: samba-bounces+mjbarber=hearst.com@lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-bounces+mjbarber=hearst.com@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of
merle@gardenfreshcorp.com
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 12:48 PM
To: masc@intraredes.com
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Overloaded samba server. Is it a bug?

First of all, why run SuSe when CentOS is free, runs faster and is more up
to date? I have basically the same setup you have except our system is a
quad xeon system and CentOS runs flawlessly 24/7. We used to experiment
with SuSe but it is not good for a corporate environment.
Just a heads up as I have been doing this for 17 years and CentOS is the
cream of the crop for the money.

Martin Scandroli wrote:

>Experts,
>
>We've just migrated from samba 2.2.8a to samba 3.0.20b in a very large
>corporate environment. Everything was really fine in our lab, but we
>began experiment serious load problems on the productive servers the
>morning after the procedure took place. I'll try (briefly) to describe
>the characteristics of the scenario:
>
>Resources:
>
>Old Environment:
>
> Hardware:
> Dell PowerEdge 2650
> Intel Xeon Processor
> 2 GB Ram
>Raid 5 (via perc raid controller) on 10k scsi disks
> Software:
> SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 8
> Samba 2.2.8a Servers
> cups printing service
>openldap2 as backend (with replicas all over the country, about 3000
>objects in the tree)
> HeartBeat as high availability Service
>
>Everything was charming here!!!!!!
>
>
>New Environment
>
> Hardware:
> Dell PowerEdge 2850 Servers
>2 Intel Xeon 3.2 GHz (HT i think... i see 4 of them) Processors
> 4 GB Ram
>Raid 5 (via Perc raid controller) on 15k scsi disks
>
> Software
> SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9
> Samba 3.0.20b Servers
> cups printing service
>Novell eDirectory 8.7.3.4 as backend (Very distributed too, about 4000
>objects in the tree)
> HeartBeat as high availability Service drbd to keep
>samba configuracion replicated among the cluster nodes.
>
>Problems we're having (or had, just as a usefull comment):
>
>eDirectory turned out to be much slower than openldap2 when responding
>to nss_ldap queries (i mean.... about 7 or 8 times slower!!!!) so
>queries asking for members of large groups (i.e: groups with about 1500
>users and
>above) were usually terminated with an RPC timeout
>
>Everything started to work when we added the ldapsam:trusted=yes
>parameter. It dramatically reduced the response times and affected
>queries began to work.
>The implementation of this feature produced some other problems (we've
>found workarrounds but i'll comment them just to provide some feedback).
>
> 1) The samba server used to die seconds after it was started.
>Something about the nobody user and it's primary group prevented it
>from working in a proper manner. We solved this inconvinient by adding
>de user nobody and it's corresponding primary group to the backend.
>2) Root user was no longer recognized, (we still trying to figure out
>why, the user's been added to the tree, but nothing changed) so we used
>the new role based administration provided by samba 3 as a workarround
>(SeMachinAccount...), and no more troubles about it.
>
>
>
> 3)THIS ISSUE IS KILLING US!!!!!!!
>
>Something happens in a determined moment of the day (rush hour).
>Everything is running smoothly (0.3 - 0.4 of load average) when the
>load start to grow indefinitely!!!!!!. It raises from 0.3 to 50 in a
>matter of seconds!, and it keeps growing till the server dies. We
>couldn't find the reason of this, but it happens in a two hors
>interval. Before and after this interval, there are no errors of any
>kind.
>
> I'll paste some log errors (just the ones i saw). I don't think
>they're the cause of our problems, buy you're the experts.
>
>Any clue? do you need me to gather some kind of information? any DoS
>bug reported for this samba version?
>
> Any help will be highly appreciated
>
>Regards,
>Martin
>
>--
>
> from /var/log/messages
>
> Oct 25 04:34:15 srvsmb01 smbd[2961]: [2005/10/25 04:34:15, 0]
>lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(762)
> Oct 25 04:34:15 srvsmb01 smbd[2961]: Error writing 4 bytes to
>client. -1. (Connection reset by peer)
> Oct 25 04:40:36 srvsmb01 smbd[2983]: [2005/10/25 04:40:36, 0]
>lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1222)
>Oct 25 04:40:36 srvsmb01 smbd[2983]: getpeername failed. Error was
>Transport endpoint is not connected
> Oct 25 04:40:36 srvsmb01 smbd[2983]: [2005/10/25 04:40:36, 0]
>lib/util_sock.c:write_data(554)
>Oct 25 04:40:36 srvsmb01 smbd[2983]: write_data: write failure in
>writing to client 167.252.104.98. Error Connection reset
> by peer
>
> (this happens very often)
>
> From /var/log/samba/log.nmbd
>
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:01, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:01, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:01, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:01, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:01, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:01, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:01, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:01, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:01, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:01, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:01, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:02, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:02, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:02, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:02, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:02, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:02, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:02, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>tdb(unnamed): tdb_open_ex: /var/lib/samba/unexpected.tdb (2059,2959) is
>already open in this process
> [2005/10/26 04:17:02, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767)
>
> from /var/log/samba/log.smbd
>
> smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
> [2005/10/25 01:29:28, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(951)
> Connection to LDAP server failed for the 1 try!
> [2005/10/25 01:29:29, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(822)
> smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
> [2005/10/25 01:29:29, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(951)
> Connection to LDAP server failed for the 2 try!
> [2005/10/25 01:29:29, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(270)
>cmqtbe4 closed file Planta/TPM/Envasado/Linea4/LLENADORA/Merma Linea
>4.xls (numopen=0)
> [2005/10/25 01:29:29, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(372)
>CMQTBE4 opened file Planta/TPM/Envasado/Linea4/LLENADORA/Merma Linea
>4.xls read=No write=Yes (numopen=1)
> [2005/10/25 01:29:29, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(270)
>cmqtbe4 closed file Planta/TPM/Envasado/Linea4/LLENADORA/Merma Linea
>4.xls (numopen=0)
> [2005/10/25 01:29:30, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(822)
> smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
> [2005/10/25 01:29:30, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(951)
> Connection to LDAP server failed for the 3 try!
> [2005/10/25 01:29:31, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(822)
> smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
> [2005/10/25 01:29:31, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(951)
> Connection to LDAP server failed for the 4 try!
> [2005/10/25 01:29:32, 2]
>rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:find_printer_index_by_hnd(270)
> find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found:
>_spoolss_writeprinter: Invalid handle (OTHER:15976:11737)
> [2005/10/25 01:29:32, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(822)
> smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
> [2005/10/25 01:29:32, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(951)
> Connection to LDAP server failed for the 5 try!
> [2005/10/25 01:29:33, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(822)
> smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
> [2005/10/25 01:29:33, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(951)
> Connection to LDAP server failed for the 6 try!
>[2005/10/25 01:29:34, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(704)
>setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close
>all old resources.
>[2005/10/25 01:29:34, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(704)
>setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close
>all old resources.
> [2005/10/25 01:29:34, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(822)
> smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
> [2005/10/25 01:29:34, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(951)
> Connection to LDAP server failed for the 7 try!
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0