This is a discussion on Re: [Samba] large smb.conf file within the Samba forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bruno Ferreira wrote: > Nathan Vidican wrote: > >> [snip] >> >&...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Bruno Ferreira wrote: > Nathan Vidican wrote: > >> [snip] >> >> Travis Knabe wrote: >> >>> I have about 5000 distinct shares defined in my smb.conf file. As >>> you can imagine it's quite large. >>> >>> Everyone once in awhile all the smbd daemons ( in top ) go to a run >>> state and pretty much bring the system to a halt. The system is WAY >>> oversized. 99.999% of the day samba runs fine. We _THINK_ we've >>> narrowed down the times when the smbd processes go crazy to a time >>> when we're updating the smb.conf file. Does this sound reasonable? >>> Is there a better way to create the neccessary shares? >> > I may be pointing out the obvious, but has he tried using the share > copying commands in smb.conf so that Samba's parser doesn't have to read > the definitions for each and every individual share? I don't think it's actually the parser that's the problem but the memory allocation and copying. cheers, jerry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDQaYEIR7qMdg1EfYRAuuAAJ9QiHcmc4S7XnThIwTbFN 2NH7xgZACg0pEJ FQJy9CyTUdv9OcJrBtMAWwE= =NqEh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba |