Re: [Samba] Horrible Linux/Samba vs Windows political battle - can

This is a discussion on Re: [Samba] Horrible Linux/Samba vs Windows political battle - can within the Samba forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On Tuesday 20 September 2005 07:49, Gregory A. Cain wrote: > If there is anyone reading this who works ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > Samba

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2005
Leon Brooks
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [Samba] Horrible Linux/Samba vs Windows political battle - can

On Tuesday 20 September 2005 07:49, Gregory A. Cain wrote:
> If there is anyone reading this who works in the field of
> architecture or engineering, and with CAD or BIM software, who is
> using Linux as your server software, I would sure be appreciative it
> if you could write a testimonial for me to help me convince my boss
> that migrating from Linux to MS would be a horrible mistake.


I have a _customer_ who does CAD work and steel fabrication in a
northern suburb of Perth, Western Australia. Needess to say, running
their office from the same wires as arc welders and rail cranes doesn't
do wonders for reliability, to say nothing of having steel fines
contantly blowing through into the office, and the computers therein.

They use SaMBa for their file server (everything-server, as it does
email and other stuff as well) and have never had a problem with it.

I have another client whose problems I posted about a few days ago.
Their SaMBa server shoves data at over 9MB/s over a 100Mb/s LAN,
roughly 2.5x faster than a Windows 2k3 box doing the same thing.

For those who feel the urge to make constructive suggestions about the
problem I posted, Windows 2000 clients behave the same way, that is,
file I/O through Windows Explorer or smbclient roars through, but
running an app off the server is agony (an absurd number of 512-byte
and 40-byte SMB requests, almost all of them on the EXE file).

I've used regedit to explain to an XP client machine that it really,
really needs to cache and use OpLocks, to no obvious effect. I've
switched on (and off) everything related in SaMBa, marked files and
shares read-only and so on, likewise without obvious effect.

Cheers; Leon

--
http://cyberknights.com.au/ Modern tools; traditional dedication
http://plug.linux.org.au/ Member, Perth Linux User Group
http://slpwa.asn.au/ Member, Linux Professionals WA
http://osia.net.au/ Member, Open Source Industry Australia
http://linux.org.au/ Member, Linux Australia
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0