This is a discussion on Re: [Samba] Samba and Symbolic links (Related to PAM_MOUNT ) within the Samba forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; --===============80079756796814006== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gTeJppB7Xk1j/SztjVXG" --=-gTeJppB7Xk1j/...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
--===============80079756796814006== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gTeJppB7Xk1j/SztjVXG" --=-gTeJppB7Xk1j/SztjVXG Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 20:03, Ryan McConigley wrote: >=20 > Hi all, >=20 > I am using the pam_mount module to automount a home directory via=20 > smb. Works great for some logins. I can ssh in, it mounts the file syst= em=20 > automatically, I get access to the files, read and write and everything i= s=20 > good. >=20 > However, when I try to log in at the console via KDE, I get various erro= rs=20 > asking me to check if various services are running and eventually the log= in=20 > fails. >=20 > It took me a while to discover that the reason it was failing was that t= he=20 > system was trying create a symbolic link on the smb mounted file system a= nd=20 > failing. >=20 > On the server, I'm enabled the unix extensions, (unix extensions =3D yes= ),=20 > but it appears the client doesn't recognise this. (Client and server are= =20 > both running Redhat Linux 7.3) Samba (and CIFS) is not a really good choice for unix->unix file-sharing. As you have noted, not all the semantics are preserved well. =20 Things might be better with the 'CIFS VFS', a replacement for smbfs in the 2.5 kernel (and available on samba.org for 2.4). > I'm using the most recent default versions of smbmount from the RPM=20 > (Version 2.2.7-security-rollup-fix), however I suspect that I may have to= =20 > compile things up, but I can't find anything definate. >=20 > Do I need a different version of smbmount; a special compile of smbmount= =20 > or something completely different? If you can use something different - things like 'SFS' www.fs.net or even NFS, you might have less trouble - but I've not ventured beyond NFS myself. Andrew Bartlett --=20 Andrew Bartlett abartlet@pcug.org.au Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet@samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet@hawkerc.net http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net --=-gTeJppB7Xk1j/SztjVXG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA++DBrw6AkmCjZ77cRAp+uAKCsmiz7o//FMniUU/2DXy60lOTveQCfRZ8t eMNJa0OOAhImZDLrl/Mkv7s= =A7t6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gTeJppB7Xk1j/SztjVXG-- --===============80079756796814006== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba --===============80079756796814006==-- |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|