This is a discussion on Re: replicating a live directory within the Rsync forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On Wed 02 Apr 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 20:55 +0200, Lasse Kliemann ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Wed 02 Apr 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 20:55 +0200, Lasse Kliemann wrote: > > * Message by -Joao Miguel Ferreira- from Sun 2008-03-30: > > > We would really like to leave all those important services up but we are > > > really affraid of producing a corrupted replica... > > > > Use filesystem snapshots. > It's not clear to me how a filesystem snapshot would solve the problem. > It guarantees that rsync sees an instantaneous state of the filesystem, > but that state could still include files that are half-modified by other > programs. That's usually preferable to having an inconsistent set of files. Still not ideal, but still... Some apps can also be told to go into a "freeze" state before making such a snapshot (e.g. oracle). Paul Slootman -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|