Re: Nulls instead of data

This is a discussion on Re: Nulls instead of data within the Rsync forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 08:34:53PM +0200, Wojtek.Pilorz wrote: > The files saved in partial directory ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > Rsync

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-24-2005
Wayne Davison
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Nulls instead of data

On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 08:34:53PM +0200, Wojtek.Pilorz wrote:
> The files saved in partial directory have length equal to that of the
> original file, but the contents still contains regions with NULLs


Yes, as I said in my last email, that's what rsync does with unreadable
sections of the file. There's nothing wrong with this action, as it
can't know what data goes in the places that it can't read.

> Should I send information from trace files?


No, you need to solve the read() errors on the source side. Those
aren't rsync's fault, at least, not directly -- my previous email
contained instructions on how to make rsync read smaller chucks
(since you thought that might help avoid the read errors).

...wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0