Is there any option to check the synchronization is going on ?

This is a discussion on Is there any option to check the synchronization is going on ? within the Rsync forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0650033939== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080903060407040504080402" This is ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > Rsync

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2005
Lakshminarayanan Radhakrishnan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Is there any option to check the synchronization is going on ?

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0650033939==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------080903060407040504080402"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080903060407040504080402
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Wayne,

Is there any option to check whether the synchronization is going on
between
machine A and machine B ?

Requirement is, I have to check/monitor is there any synchronization
takes place between A and B,
if not, then only i have to allow the machine A to be rebooted by the User.

thanks
LAKS


Wayne Davison wrote:

>On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 11:24:13AM +0530, Lakshminarayanan Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>
>>Can u please highlight the important fixes added upto 2.6.6 ?
>>
>>

>
>There have been several security fixes for those using rsync as a
>daemon. The memory use has decreased dramatically compared with the
>2.5.x series, and some options such as --hard-link are *much* more
>efficient. Some new options I particularly like: --delete-during
>(--del), --itemize-changes (-i), the --filter functionality, and
>--partial-dir (I use have the RSYNC_PARTIAL_DIR environment variable set
>for improved safety when using -P). Large files are handled much more
>efficiently, exclude patterns are less buggy, batch files actually work
>right, etc. etc. Lots of other really useful features and bug-fixes
>too numerous to mention here.
>
>
>
>>In samba site, anywhere mentioned about what patches given for each
>>release ?
>>
>>

>
>There's a link on the main page to the NEWS and OLDNEWS files:
>
> http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS
> http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/OLDNEWS
>
>They mention LOTS of changes, though, so you may want to skim mainly
>the SECURITY FIXES, ENHANCEMENTS, and BUG FIXES sections.
>
>..wayne..
>
>
>


--------------080903060407040504080402
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Wayne, <br>
<br>
Is there any option to check whether the synchronization is going on
between <br>
machine A and machine B&nbsp; ?<br>
<br>
Requirement is,&nbsp; I have to check/monitor is there any synchronization
takes place between A and B, <br>
if not, then only i have to allow the machine A to be rebooted by the
User.<br>
<br>
thanks<br>
LAKS<br>
<br>
<br>
Wayne Davison wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid20050729190500.GB26009@blorf.net">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 11:24:13AM +0530, Lakshminarayanan Radhakrishnan wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Can u please highlight the important fixes added upto 2.6.6 ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
There have been several security fixes for those using rsync as a
daemon. The memory use has decreased dramatically compared with the
2.5.x series, and some options such as --hard-link are *much* more
efficient. Some new options I particularly like: --delete-during
(--del), --itemize-changes (-i), the --filter functionality, and
--partial-dir (I use have the RSYNC_PARTIAL_DIR environment variable set
for improved safety when using -P). Large files are handled much more
efficiently, exclude patterns are less buggy, batch files actually work
right, etc. etc. Lots of other really useful features and bug-fixes
too numerous to mention here.

</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">In samba site, anywhere mentioned about what patches given for each
release ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
There's a link on the main page to the NEWS and OLDNEWS files:

<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS">http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/OLDNEWS">http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/OLDNEWS</a>

They mention LOTS of changes, though, so you may want to skim mainly
the SECURITY FIXES, ENHANCEMENTS, and BUG FIXES sections.

...wayne..

</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------080903060407040504080402--


--===============0650033939==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
--===============0650033939==--

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0