Re: [rrd-users] NAN and 0 in aggregate graphs
This is a discussion on Re: [rrd-users] NAN and 0 in aggregate graphs within the RRD Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote: > > Hmm, looking at the doc pages it doesn't look like boolean operators &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
03-31-2008
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [rrd-users] NAN and 0 in aggregate graphs
Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
> > Hmm, looking at the doc pages it doesn't look like boolean operators >> (AND, OR) are provided, > >er... > >FALSE==0 >TRUE==1 (in reality: TRUE==anything but 0) > > \ > x y \ + * >------------+-------------- >FALSE FALSE | FALSE FALSE >FALSE TRUE | TRUE FALSE >TRUE FALSE | TRUE FALSE >TRUE TRUE | TRUE TRUE > >If you want: if (x and y) then B else C: > >then use CDEF: x,y,*,B,C,IF Doh, so obvious when it's pointed out ! _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users 
|
Linear Mode
