Re: [rrd-users] filesize using 32-bit vs. 64-bit

This is a discussion on Re: [rrd-users] filesize using 32-bit vs. 64-bit within the RRD Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; I am waiting for cross platform, but for I changed to using the i386 version of collectd on our x86_64 ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > RRD Users

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-04-2007
Ulf Zimmermann
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [rrd-users] filesize using 32-bit vs. 64-bit

I am waiting for cross platform, but for I changed to using the i386 version of collectd on our x86_64 systems, so that I have a single place to graph.


----- Original Message -----
From: Tobias Oetiker <tobi@oetiker.ch>
To: Ulf Zimmermann
Cc: michael.renner@gmx.de <michael.renner@gmx.de>; rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch <rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch>
Sent: Sat Nov 03 17:38:22 2007
Subject: Re: [rrd-users] filesize using 32-bit vs. 64-bit

Hi Ulf,

the file size difference comes from the padding differences between
32 and 64 bit ... once I introduce the cross platform file format,
all architectures will take the same (manybe slightly bigger) size.

cheers
tobi

Yesterday Ulf Zimmermann wrote:

> No, here is an example:
>
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 12:00 cpu-idle.rrd
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 cpu-idle.rrd.x86_64
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 12:00 cpu-interrupt.rrd
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58
> cpu-interrupt.rrd.x86_64
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 12:00 cpu-nice.rrd
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 cpu-nice.rrd.x86_64
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 11:59 cpu-softirq.rrd
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 cpu-softirq.rrd.x86_64
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 12:00 cpu-system.rrd
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 cpu-system.rrd.x86_64
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 11:59 cpu-user.rrd
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 cpu-user.rrd.x86_64
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 11:59 cpu-wait.rrd
> 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 cpu-wait.rrd.x86_64
>
> The rrd.x86_64 files were what I just had on our RedHat EL4 x86_64
> machines. I converted them to i386. Filesize is not much different.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rrd-users-bounces@lists.oetiker.ch [mailto:rrd-users-
> > bounces@lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Michael Renner
> > Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 09:10
> > To: rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch
> > Subject: [rrd-users] filesize using 32-bit vs. 64-bit
> >
> > Moin,
> >
> > just for curiosity: does a rrd file made with a 64-bit perl wil have

> the
> > double size of one made using a 32-bit perl?
> >
> > Thanks
> > --
> > |Michael Renner E-mail: michael.renner@gmx.de |
> > |D-81541 Munich Germany ICQ: #112280325 |
> > |Germany Don't drink as root! ESC:wq
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rrd-users mailing list
> > rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch
> > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users

>
> _______________________________________________
> rrd-users mailing list
> rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch
> https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
>
>


--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten
http://it.oetiker.ch tobi@oetiker.ch ++41 62 213 9902
_______________________________________________
rrd-users mailing list
rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0