This is a discussion on Re: [rrd-users] filesize using 32-bit vs. 64-bit within the RRD Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; I am waiting for cross platform, but for I changed to using the i386 version of collectd on our x86_64 ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I am waiting for cross platform, but for I changed to using the i386 version of collectd on our x86_64 systems, so that I have a single place to graph.
----- Original Message ----- From: Tobias Oetiker <tobi@oetiker.ch> To: Ulf Zimmermann Cc: michael.renner@gmx.de <michael.renner@gmx.de>; rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch <rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch> Sent: Sat Nov 03 17:38:22 2007 Subject: Re: [rrd-users] filesize using 32-bit vs. 64-bit Hi Ulf, the file size difference comes from the padding differences between 32 and 64 bit ... once I introduce the cross platform file format, all architectures will take the same (manybe slightly bigger) size. cheers tobi Yesterday Ulf Zimmermann wrote: > No, here is an example: > > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 12:00 cpu-idle.rrd > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 cpu-idle.rrd.x86_64 > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 12:00 cpu-interrupt.rrd > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 > cpu-interrupt.rrd.x86_64 > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 12:00 cpu-nice.rrd > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 cpu-nice.rrd.x86_64 > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 11:59 cpu-softirq.rrd > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 cpu-softirq.rrd.x86_64 > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 12:00 cpu-system.rrd > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 cpu-system.rrd.x86_64 > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 11:59 cpu-user.rrd > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 cpu-user.rrd.x86_64 > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296728 Nov 1 11:59 cpu-wait.rrd > 296 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296944 Nov 1 11:58 cpu-wait.rrd.x86_64 > > The rrd.x86_64 files were what I just had on our RedHat EL4 x86_64 > machines. I converted them to i386. Filesize is not much different. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: rrd-users-bounces@lists.oetiker.ch [mailto:rrd-users- > > bounces@lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Michael Renner > > Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 09:10 > > To: rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch > > Subject: [rrd-users] filesize using 32-bit vs. 64-bit > > > > Moin, > > > > just for curiosity: does a rrd file made with a 64-bit perl wil have > the > > double size of one made using a 32-bit perl? > > > > Thanks > > -- > > |Michael Renner E-mail: michael.renner@gmx.de | > > |D-81541 Munich Germany ICQ: #112280325 | > > |Germany Don't drink as root! ESC:wq > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rrd-users mailing list > > rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch > > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users > > _______________________________________________ > rrd-users mailing list > rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users > > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten http://it.oetiker.ch tobi@oetiker.ch ++41 62 213 9902 _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users |