This is a discussion on Re: [rrd-users] newbie rrd question - probably a very old issue within the RRD Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; --===============1910984501== Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sounds like this is in dire need of a FAQ! :) so why does ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
--===============1910984501==
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sounds like this is in dire need of a FAQ! :) so why does rrd dump and rrd fetch show different results? I'll check the "--resolution" option before continuing that question. and I could swear I "fixed" this problem with a simple modification to the RRA definition. I'm almost positive it had something to do with "ABS", but that was 5 years ago. >From: Tobias Oetiker <tobi@oetiker.ch> >To: Dan Gahlinger <dgahling@hotmail.com> >CC: jfesler@gigo.com, rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch >Subject: Re: [rrd-users] newbie rrd question - probably a very old issue >Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 20:49:26 +0200 (CEST) > >Dan, > >note that rrdfetch is NOT consolidating anything, it shows you what >is stored in the rrd ... if you want to see what is actually >stored, use rrdtool dump ... > >you may also want to read through the mailinglist archives, since >we get someone like you every few months how needs many days of >patient explaining until he understand why rrdtool is designed the >way it is designed and why it works the way it works, and why this >is the right thing todo ... (it has been like this for the last 8 >years actually and tousands have used and understood the logic) ... >you will get there ... > >cheers >tobi > > > > > > that's not exactly what I want. > > > > to be honest, I'd be happy if rrd did one simple thing (or two depending >on > > your point of view). > > > > I'd recommend the "min" and "max" of the average function be done a bit > > differently. > > for an average graph, the "maximum" (shown at the bottom) should always >be > > kept, > > and the "minimum" should always be kept > > > > also the points for those on the graph should always be kept, even if it >means > > the verticals in the graph are stretched a bit. > > > > the graph doesnt have to show ever portion of the scale either. by this >I mean > > if there are no values between 10 and 40, you dont need to show the >portions > > from 11-39 essentially > > as long as the maximum, minimum and average are represented properly > > > > it should be simple enough to keep track of the minimum and maximum over >time. > > my logic: > > if you have a spike of 100 one day and that is you maximum, then a week >or a > > month or a year later, if that is still your maximum, then it is always >your > > maximum, and the spike should be shown > > today it should be the max, tomorrow it should be the max, and until a >higher > > value occurs, it should always be the max, same with minimum, if we got >a > > zero, that will always be the minimum. and the overall average should be >the > > average between those two values. > > > > otherwise the data is incorrect and quickly becomes meaningless. > > yesterday it spiked to 90, but today it shows the max is only 30, so did >it > > spike? not according to the graph it didnt. > > > > and I still dont understand why the command line (rrdfetch) is >consolidating, > > it has no graphing limitations > > > > I don't know a better way to do it. > > Dan. > > > From: Jason Fesler <jfesler@gigo.com> > > > To: Dan Gahlinger <dgahling@hotmail.com> > > > CC: tobi@oetiker.ch, rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch > > > Subject: Re: [rrd-users] newbie rrd question - probably a very old >issue > > > Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 10:09:32 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > > Based on a side conversation with Dan, this is what I'm understanding: > > > > > > RRD will graph exactly one consolidated point in time, if there are >more > > > points than pixels on the X axis. Dan wants *all* value points >represented, > > > not consolidated. RRD has no option to do that. > > > > > > I'm thinking that *maybe* it can be faked, with some stacked graphs or > > > something, *if* MIN and MAX were also included in the rrd file; do a >fill > > > between min and max. > > > > > > But it isn't going to happen with a single graph statement, and I'm >having > > > problems figuring out how to sanely show min/average/max if desired. >:-) > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ _______________ > > Show Your Messenger Buddies How You Really Feel > > http://www.freemessengeremoticons.ca/?icid=EMENCA122 > > > > > >-- >Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten >http://it.oetiker.ch tobi@oetiker.ch ++41 62 213 9902 __________________________________________________ _______________ Kick back and relax with hot games and cool activities at the Messenger Café. http://www.cafemessenger.com?ocid=TX...SeptHMtagline1 --===============1910984501== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users --===============1910984501==-- |