This is a discussion on Re: [rrd-users] trying to understand the relationship between within the RRD Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Simon Hobson wrote: > Mark Seger wrote: > >> The thing that's interesting about this whole situation is ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Simon Hobson wrote: > Mark Seger wrote: > >> The thing that's interesting about this whole situation is that on one >> level rrd appears to draw a cleaner graph and the gnuplot one looks a >> little fuzzier, but I also think the gnuplot provides valuable >> information that gets lost, and probably missed with rrd. If my >> examples were disk performance numbers rrd could have led someone to the >> conclusion that everything was running just fine at a load of 20 while >> gnuplot shows there's really a range from 0 to 20 and things are not >> fine. If you zoom into the rrd data you definitely can see see the >> details of the drop off, but my fear is how many people would bother. >> They would see the day long data and think everything is fine. >> > > On the other hand, I can't remember when it was, but I certainly > learned about the basic arithmetic functions of min, max, and average > at school. RRD is simply a tool, as is GNUplot. > > What I would say is that if you want to plot every datapoint, as > collected, with no normalisation or consolidation then rrd is > probably not the right tool - you should plot with GNUplot. > > What rrd does do (very well) is allow you to collect detailed numbers > and balance the storage and processing requirements vs the need to > keep detailed numbers for a long time - eg collecting every 5 seconds > for a few hours, but dropping the resolution to make it practical to > store data for a whole year. > yes, I agree completely about the ability about rrd's strength being to be able to store data long term. but if take a sample every 5 seconds but then can't look at it at that granularity what's the point? I did see the suggestions about using multiple lines/averages for each variable, and if you only have a few I suppose that could work too, but I'm trying to deal with hundreds. perhaps the best compromise is to use gnuplot for fine grained plotting and using rrd for archiving. -mark > _______________________________________________ > rrd-users mailing list > rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users > _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|