This is a discussion on Re: [rrd-users] Huge values within the RRD Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 05:18:12PM +0300, Andrikopoulos Dimitrios wrote: > No, there is no counter wrap. ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 05:18:12PM +0300, Andrikopoulos Dimitrios wrote:
> No, there is no counter wrap. I used the "snmpwalk" to poll manually the > SNMP counter in question > and it found no wrap. Most likely it is a counter reset, which is perceived by RRDtool as a counter wrap. This can happen when you reset a device. Setting a maximum allowable rate should help. Using DERIVE instead of COUNTER, and setting the minimum allowable value to zero, should also help but will cause a missed update (thus UNKNOWN) in case of a true counter wrap. If you can, try updating with "U" (unknown) as soon as you reset a device, followed by an update of zero. The topic is discussed frequently so it should be relatively easy to find this in the email archives. In short: you are telling RRDtool that you don't know the counter value at reset time, and you do know that it starts from zero again. A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: The lost context. Q: What makes top-posted replies harder to read than bottom-posted? A: Yes. Q: Should I trim down the quoted part of an email to which I'm replying? http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|