This is a discussion on [rrd-users] Re: rrdtool 1.2.8 is out within the RRD Users forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On Mon, 16 May 2005, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > It seems that there are many broken python setups out there ... &...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> It seems that there are many broken python setups out there ... > this did not bond well with the fact that configure died with an > error when it found out ... :-) > > The 1.2.8 release features a new and working configure switch: > > --disable-python > > and if configure figures out on its own that python does not work, > it will just not compile the extention without making a fuss about > it. > > http://people.ee.ethz.ch/oetiker/webtools/rrdtool/pub On Linux x86_64 the rrdtoolmodule.so is installed in: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rrdtoolmodule.so instead of: /usr/lib64/python2.3/site-packages/rrdtoolmodule.so I think the correct way to deduct the location for binary modules in python is: sysconfig.get_python_lib(1) instead of sysconfig.get_python_lib() PS1 Is rrdtool 1.2 a drop-in replacement for the 1.0.x ? Considered stable ? PS2 Are there any plans to add the PHP bindings to the 1.2 series ? Thanks in advance, -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power] -- Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request@list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe Help mailto:rrd-users-request@list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-users WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi |