Which Is The Better Approach To Working With Javascript?

Johnny wrote:
> Barry wrote:
>> i would think from a business stand-point that if server-sided js was
>> as capable and robust as php or asp that using one language in the
>> company's web development would be a huge, pragmatic plus. imo, ss-js
>> simply isn't there yet nor is there a developer-based demand for it to
>> be in the near future.
>>
>> cheers
> You might also have bet on beta-max as being the better than vhs
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta-max
>
> the best is not always what succeeds.
> Cheers.
In the case of javascript that is axiomatic ;-)

"The Natural Philosopher" <a@b.c> wrote in message
news:1215853959.31612.1@proxy02.news.clara.net...
> Johnny wrote:
>> Barry wrote:
>>> i would think from a business stand-point that if server-sided js was as
>>> capable and robust as php or asp that using one language in the
>>> company's web development would be a huge, pragmatic plus. imo, ss-js
>>> simply isn't there yet nor is there a developer-based demand for it to
>>> be in the near future.
>>>
>>> cheers
>> You might also have bet on beta-max as being the better than vhs
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta-max
>>
>> the best is not always what succeeds.
>> Cheers.
> In the case of javascript that is axiomatic ;-)

lol.