Re: limiting transferred data using curl

You mean "counts." You're sorely mistaken if you
think a spammer's opinion has any merit here.

Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
> It count for a lot more than a top posting asshole.
>

Like I said, your opinion is meaningless in this thread.


Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
> Tom Stewart wrote:
>> Defending a statement that insults anyone who uses AOL or
>> Google makes you look pretty ridiculous.
>>
>> You're a waste of time. Maybe somebody else can
>> knock some sense into you.
>>
>
> Nope. It just shows what a complete asshole you are.
>

Tom Stewart wrote:
> Trying to invent rules in the charter that don't exist
> won't help your case here. Especially when you repeatedly
> fail to put [OT] in your subjects to alert people that
> your posting off-topic.
>
> You get an F for your knowledge of netiquette.
>

Does your mommy know what an asshole you're making of yourself on her
computer? I hear her calling - better go answer here.

Now get lost, asshole.

<plonk>

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Tom Stewart wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>> Tom Stewart wrote:
>>> Defending a statement that insults anyone who uses AOL or
>>> Google makes you look pretty ridiculous.
>>>
>>> You're a waste of time. Maybe somebody else can
>>> knock some sense into you.
>>>
>> Nope. It just shows what a complete asshole you are.
>>
>
> Like I said, your opinion is meaningless in this thread.
>
>

(Top posting fixed)

Nope. The opinion of a top posting asshole like you is completely
meaningless in this newsgroup.

Now I here your mommy calling - better go answer her, little boy.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

..oO(Tom Stewart)

>You've sent at lease 10 pieces of spam just in this
>one thread.

You've sent 100% spam in the entire group.

>You can continue denying and resisting the rules,
>but you're only digging yourself into a deeper hole.

*ROFL* You're the right one talking about rules and holes.

>Try studying this:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-topic
>
>"Internet trolls will sometimes post off topic messages
>deliberately on internet forums to aggravate members or
>hijack a discussion."

Try studying this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_pos...nline_replying

| This style of posting is frequent on Usenet, Internet forums, and
| other situations in which the previous discussion is publicly
| available. [...]
| Inline replies keep related sections of a discussion together within a
| message. [...]

Enough now, this is boring.

*plonk*

Micha

..oO(Tom Stewart)

>Not only did you insult Google users, but most AOL users as well.

Most AOL users _are_ idiots. You want to read a bit about AOL's Usenet
history and the reason why they received at least one UDP request over
the years. Google for "Eternal September" if you like.

>I can't imagine that you believe this garbage.
>
>This is unacceptable and the kind of spam we don't tolerate here.

You're not part of any "we".

>comp.lang.php's charter states: "The ultimate goal is to create a
>relaxed yet helpful environment in which people can seek answers
>to general questions about PHP..."
>
>Personal insults will not be tolerated.

Tell your mummy when you come back from school.

EOT
Micha

..oO(Tom Stewart)

>And of course, Google has done the most to preserve Usenet,
>with their indexing of millions of messages dating back to
>1981:

They've just taken over what others have created. But obviously you're
too young to remember DejaNews. You're excused for that.

Micha

Actually, Google extended the archives significantly
after it acquired DejaNews and continues to do expand
it.

The announcement I posted was issued about a year
after the DejaNews acquisition.

--
Tom Stewart, ATC


Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> wrote:
> .oO(Tom Stewart)
>
>>And of course, Google has done the most to preserve Usenet,
>>with their indexing of millions of messages dating back to
>>1981:
>
> They've just taken over what others have created. But obviously you're
> too young to remember DejaNews. You're excused for that.
>
> Micha

Insulting millions of people who happen to use
a particular ISP you dislike isn't helping your
case.

And continuing to post replies to someone you
claim to have plonked suggests you don't know
what the term means.

--
Tom Stewart, ATC


Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> wrote:
> .oO(Tom Stewart)
>
>>Not only did you insult Google users, but most AOL users as well.
>
> Most AOL users _are_ idiots. You want to read a bit about AOL's Usenet
> history and the reason why they received at least one UDP request over
> the years. Google for "Eternal September" if you like.
>
>>I can't imagine that you believe this garbage.
>>
>>This is unacceptable and the kind of spam we don't tolerate here.
>
> You're not part of any "we".
>
>>comp.lang.php's charter states: "The ultimate goal is to create a
>>relaxed yet helpful environment in which people can seek answers
>>to general questions about PHP..."
>>
>>Personal insults will not be tolerated.
>
> Tell your mummy when you come back from school.
>
> EOT
> Micha

..oO(<tichini@gmail.com>)

>And continuing to post replies to someone you
>claim to have plonked suggests you don't know
>what the term means.

I surely do know what it means. And with a proper newsreader you would
know that there are various killfile options. Currently your postings
are just marked as read, but thanks for reminding me that I should
probably increase the level and let them be deleted automatically.

Micha