Session or browser problem??

"Rik Wasmus" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote
> Argument has been done over and over again.

true, it is a favorite flamewar topic. like emacs vs. vi, or 2 spaces vs. 4
spaces indentation.

you mis-quoted me in your response! a professional editor would cry at the
amateurish way you cut-and-paste quotes together.

there are plenty of posters who use top style in this ng. do you really
think you can convince anyone to use your personal preference, especially
when you can't even quote properly yourself?

--Jackie S

"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote
> Yes, there is, and you have to look at each newsgroup. The standard in
> this newsgroup is bottom or interwoven posting.

On 31 Oct, 15:56, "Jackie Silva" <maritanl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> there are plenty of posters who use top style in this ng.
No there are only a few others as ignorant as you who do his. The vast
majority of posters here are sensible.

Greetings, Jackie Silva.
In reply to Your message dated Wednesday, October 31, 2007, 18:48:30,

> there are multiple posting conventions used on usenet. read up:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

> your arguments against one posting style are based on the original techical
> limitations of usenet.

Please don't top-post.
It is hard to read and understand.
Period.


--
Sincerely Yours, AnrDaemon <anrdaemon@freemail.ru>

what kind of reading problems are you having?

"AnrDaemon" <anrdaemon@freemail.ru> wrote
> Please don't top-post.
> It is hard to read and understand.
> Period.

you misspelled "this" and should have a comma after "No". do you spell check
your posts?

"Captain Paralytic" <paul_lautman@yahoo.com> wrote
> No there are only a few others as ignorant as you who do his. The vast
> majority of posters here are sensible.

Jackie Silva wrote:
> "Jeff Gaines" <jgaines_newsid@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:xn0fd3igc2joqxj000@news.individual.net...
>> On 31/10/2007 in message <13ig9nsqr2ak39d@news.supernews.com> Jackie Silva
>> wrote:
>>
>>> there is no "standard" posting style as long as it's clear and
>>> understandable! top-posting is fine. bottom-posting is good too. it's a
>>> matter of individual preference.... your whining is way off-topic. this
>>> has nothing to do with the OP's question.
>> It would be more accurate to say that relative newcomers are unaware of
>> the conventions, or the reasons for them.
>>
>> Try a Google for 'netiquette'.
>>
>>
>>> --Jackie S
>> There's also a standard for signature separators, you don't meet that
>> either.
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
>> This is as bad as it can get, but don't bet on it
>
>
>
> there are multiple posting conventions used on usenet. read up:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
>
> your arguments against one posting style are based on the original
techical
> limitations of usenet.
>

(Top posting fixed)

No, my arguments are based on the STANDARDS OF THIS GROUP.

And idiots who refuse to follow standards don't get many responses in
this group.

Your arguments for top posting are based on being too lazy to scroll to
the bottom of the page before you start posting.

A. Because they're arrogant jerks.
Q. Why do they continue doing it?
A. Because it upsets the normal flow of the conversation.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
A. People who top post.
Q. Why are the most annoying people on usenet?


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Jackie Silva wrote:
> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote
>> Yes, there is, and you have to look at each newsgroup. The standard in
>> this newsgroup is bottom or interwoven posting.
>
>
>

> you mis-quoted me in your response! a professional editor would cry
at the
> amateurish way you cut-and-paste quotes together.
>
> there are plenty of posters who use top style in this ng. do you really
> think you can convince anyone to use your personal preference,
especially
> when you can't even quote properly yourself?
>
> --Jackie S
>

Read again. There are very few top posters in this newsgroup. Most
people follow the newsgroup standards.

Right now we have two. And guess who's one of them?
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

Captain Paralytic wrote:
> On 31 Oct, 15:56, "Jackie Silva" <maritanl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> there are plenty of posters who use top style in this ng.
> No there are only a few others as ignorant as you who do his. The vast
> majority of posters here are sensible.
>
>

Paul, I have now come to the conclusion he's a troll.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:09:26 +0100, Jeff Gaines
<jgaines_newsid@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> On 31/10/2007 in message <13ig9nsqr2ak39d@news.supernews.com> Jackie
> Silva wrote:
>
>> there is no "standard" posting style as long as it's clear and
>> understandable! top-posting is fine. bottom-posting is good too. it's a
>> matter of individual preference.... your whining is way off-topic. this
>> has nothing to do with the OP's question.
>
> It would be more accurate to say that relative newcomers are unaware of
> the conventions, or the reasons for them.
>
> Try a Google for 'netiquette'.
>
>
>> --Jackie S
>
> There's also a standard for signature separators, you don't meet that
> either.

Actually, by the grace of his broken sig seperator I can still easily
quote his quotes. If it wouldn't be for that I'd have to jump through some
hoops, as his whole quote qould be considered one big signature :)
--
Rik Wasmus