This is a discussion on Why did PHP remove Informix support? within the PHP Language forums, part of the PHP Programming Forums category; I just installed 5.2.4 and found that the developers have removed Informix support! Informix and PHP are great ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
I just installed 5.2.4 and found that the developers have removed
Informix support! Informix and PHP are great stuff. Why pull something that works fine? http://us.php.net/manual/en/ref.ifx.php >From devzone: In other CVS news, Tony moved ext/informix out of the core in PHP_5_2 branch and CVS HEAD. The extension now resides in PECL CVS, but has no maintainer at the time of writing. The actively maintained pecl/ pdo_informix extension should be used in new code. |
|
|||
|
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:46:03 -0700, gquiring@gmail.com wrote:
> I just installed 5.2.4 and found that the developers have removed > Informix support! Informix and PHP are great stuff. Why pull something > that works fine? > > http://us.php.net/manual/en/ref.ifx.php > >>From devzone: > In other CVS news, Tony moved ext/informix out of the core in PHP_5_2 > branch and CVS HEAD. The extension now resides in PECL CVS, but has no > maintainer at the time of writing. The actively maintained pecl/ > pdo_informix extension should be used in new code. Sounds like they told you what happened and what to do about it right there. -- I told you this was going to happen. |
|
|||
|
On Sep 19, 3:46 pm, "gquir...@gmail.com" <gquir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just installed 5.2.4 and found that the developers have removed > Informix support! Informix and PHP are great stuff. Why pull > something that works fine? > > http://us.php.net/manual/en/ref.ifx.php > > >From devzone: > > In other CVS news, Tony moved ext/informix out of the core in PHP_5_2 > branch and CVS HEAD. The extension now resides in PECL CVS, but has no > maintainer at the time of writing. The actively maintained pecl/ > pdo_informix extension should be used in new code. "has no maintainer" If it has no active maintainer, it probably shouldn't be in core. |