This is a discussion on sending http requests with curl but closing before reading the response within the PHP Language forums, part of the PHP Programming Forums category; Is it possible to send http requests with curl but not have curl wait for the response? The reason I ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Is it possible to send http requests with curl but not have curl wait
for the response? The reason I ask is because I'd like to code a web app that can sorta start time consuming processes without the user having to wait. I'm doing this (with fsockopen) by sending an http request to a page that does the time consuming stuff and then immediatly closing, without having read any of the response. This way, I don't have to wait for the response. Is it possible to do the same thing with curl? Sending just HEAD requests doesn't work since it'd seem that the response (which I don't yet know how to disable, if possible) is only sent at the end of the pages execution. This might be a mod_gzip issue, but I'd rather use fsockopen then disable mod_gzip. Any ideas? |
|
|||
|
yawnmoth wrote:
> Is it possible to send http requests with curl but not have curl wait > for the response? > > The reason I ask is because I'd like to code a web app that can sorta > start time consuming processes without the user having to wait. I'm > doing this (with fsockopen) by sending an http request to a page that > does the time consuming stuff and then immediatly closing, without > having read any of the response. This way, I don't have to wait for > the response. > > Is it possible to do the same thing with curl? Sending just HEAD > requests doesn't work since it'd seem that the response (which I don't > yet know how to disable, if possible) is only sent at the end of the > pages execution. This might be a mod_gzip issue, but I'd rather use > fsockopen then disable mod_gzip. > > Any ideas? Hi yawnmoth, I think the best approach is to leave CURL and normal tcp/ip interaction intact. This means: wait for the response. In that way you actually know that system that performs the calculations is up and running. You can however make the heavycalc-script return its response immediately, and THEN do the calculations. Maybe someone has a more ellegant solution out there, but this could work: 1) use ob_start() at top of script 2) send a header telling the browser/CURL to go away: header("Location: bla.html"); where bla.html is a small useless file. Maybe containing only 'doing calc' or something. 3) flush it to the browser/CURL: ob_flush(); I expect as far as CULR is concerned, the respons ended, but you first script can now continue doing your calculations. Do not produce any output from here. Not sure where it goes if you do. :-) Not tested. I think I solved that problem once like this. But it is quickly tested by you. Please let us know if it works. just my 2 cent Regards, Erwin Moller |
|
|||
|
Erwin Moller wrote: > yawnmoth wrote: > > <snip> > > Hi yawnmoth, > > I think the best approach is to leave CURL and normal tcp/ip interaction > intact. This means: wait for the response. > In that way you actually know that system that performs the calculations is > up and running. > > You can however make the heavycalc-script return its response immediately, > and THEN do the calculations. > > Maybe someone has a more ellegant solution out there, but this could work: > 1) use ob_start() at top of script > 2) send a header telling the browser/CURL to go away: > header("Location: bla.html"); > where bla.html is a small useless file. Maybe containing only 'doing calc' > or something. > 3) flush it to the browser/CURL: ob_flush(); > > I expect as far as CULR is concerned, the respons ended, but you first > script can now continue doing your calculations. > > Do not produce any output from here. Not sure where it goes if you do. :-) > > Not tested. I think I solved that problem once like this. But it is quickly > tested by you. Please let us know if it works. > > just my 2 cent That's what register_shutdown_function used to do in PHP 4.0.6 and earlier under Apache. Unforutnately, last time I tried it, it didn't work with mod_gzip (I had to disable it for that to work). |
|
|||
|
yawnmoth wrote:
> > Erwin Moller wrote: >> yawnmoth wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >> Hi yawnmoth, >> >> I think the best approach is to leave CURL and normal tcp/ip interaction >> intact. This means: wait for the response. >> In that way you actually know that system that performs the calculations >> is up and running. >> >> You can however make the heavycalc-script return its response >> immediately, and THEN do the calculations. >> >> Maybe someone has a more ellegant solution out there, but this could >> work: 1) use ob_start() at top of script >> 2) send a header telling the browser/CURL to go away: >> header("Location: bla.html"); >> where bla.html is a small useless file. Maybe containing only 'doing >> calc' or something. >> 3) flush it to the browser/CURL: ob_flush(); >> >> I expect as far as CULR is concerned, the respons ended, but you first >> script can now continue doing your calculations. >> >> Do not produce any output from here. Not sure where it goes if you do. >> :-) >> >> Not tested. I think I solved that problem once like this. But it is >> quickly tested by you. Please let us know if it works. >> >> just my 2 cent > That's what register_shutdown_function used to do in PHP 4.0.6 and > earlier under Apache. Unforutnately, last time I tried it, it didn't > work with mod_gzip (I had to disable it for that to work). well, did you try it? |
|
|||
|
On 27 Jul 2006 00:14:10 -0700, "yawnmoth" <terra1024@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Is it possible to send http requests with curl but not have curl wait >for the response? > >The reason I ask is because I'd like to code a web app that can sorta >start time consuming processes without the user having to wait. I'm >doing this (with fsockopen) by sending an http request to a page that >does the time consuming stuff and then immediatly closing, without >having read any of the response. This way, I don't have to wait for >the response. > >Is it possible to do the same thing with curl? Sending just HEAD >requests doesn't work since it'd seem that the response (which I don't >yet know how to disable, if possible) is only sent at the end of the >pages execution. This might be a mod_gzip issue, but I'd rather use >fsockopen then disable mod_gzip. I suppose you could use CURLOPT_TIMEOUT set to a short timeout? I'm not sure what the scope of CURLOPT_TIMEOUT is - if it's for the transfer only, and CURLOPT_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT is specifically for the handshaking, then it ought to fit your purpose. -- Andy Hassall :: andy@andyh.co.uk :: http://www.andyh.co.uk http://www.andyhsoftware.co.uk/space :: disk and FTP usage analysis tool |