Re: [openssh] Re: [openssh] Re: [openssh] Re: Frequent "Connection
This is a discussion on Re: [openssh] Re: [openssh] Re: [openssh] Re: Frequent "Connection within the OpenSSH Development forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; > > On 2008-01-31 13:44, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > But would ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-01-2008
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [openssh] Re: [openssh] Re: [openssh] Re: Frequent "Connection
>
> On 2008-01-31 13:44, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > But would the device have sent a RST if it received a fragment > > it couldn't route? I'm getting an actual RST from the router on the other > > end of a WDS link towards the far end laptop. > > Some versions of Linux wrongly generate an RST in response to a bad TCP > checksum. (Wrongly because the bad checksum is telling you you can't > trust the TCP header and payload, so why generate an RST using values > from the header?) I've had problems in the past with simply bad cabling > exercising this bug. > New cables on one side, then the other, then both. Still happening. Tuc _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/li...enssh-unix-dev 
|
Linear Mode
