This is a discussion on Re: Recent MAC improvements within the OpenSSH Development forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On Jun 11 14:43, Damien Miller wrote: > Hi, > > There has been some recent work to improve ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
On Jun 11 14:43, Damien Miller wrote:
> Hi, > > There has been some recent work to improve the speed of the Message > Authentication Codes (MACs) that are used in OpenSSH. > > The first improvement is a change from Markus Friedl to reuse the MAC > context, rather than reinitialising it for every packet. This saves two > calls to the underlying hash function (e.g. SHA1) for each packet. My > tests found that this yielded at 12-16% speedup for bulk transfers to > localhost using HMAC-MD5 and arcfour256. HMAC-SHA1 should see an even > bigger improvement, because SHA1 is a more expensive hash function. > > The second improvement is Peter Valchev's addition of a new MAC: Ted > Krovetz' UMAC-64[1]. This MAC uses a very different approach than the > HMACs that OpenSSH currently supports, and it comes with a nice security > proof that guarantees its resistance so long as its underlying block > cipher (AES) remains cryptologically intact. Testing (bulk transfers to > localhost using arcfour256) found UMAC-64 to perform 20% better than > HMAC-MD5, and 28% faster than HMAC-SHA1. This new MAC may be selected > by specifying "MACs=umac-64@openssh.com" in a server or client config. > > These changes need testing on as many platforms as possible. In particular > we are interested in the following corner cases: > > - Old OpenSSL version (0.9.5ish) > - Testing between big and little endian machines (i386 vs. sparc for example) > - Testing between previous OpenSSH versions and -current > - Testing on strict alignment architectures like Alpha and Itanium > > Please report your findings to the mailing list. Builds and runs fine on Cygwin w/ openssl 0.9.8e. Exchanging data with Cygwin 4.6p1 and Linux 4.5p1 works fine. UMAC works fine between Cygwin machines. I see a 14% speed improvement in a default scp with no further options, relative to 4.6p1. Using umac-64 the speed improvement is 15%. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Project Co-Leader Red Hat _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org http://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/lis...enssh-unix-dev |