Re: Amateur Radio/FCC and the "none" encryption option

This is a discussion on Re: Amateur Radio/FCC and the "none" encryption option within the OpenSSH Development forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; On 11/11/05, Curt, WE7U <archer@eskimo.com> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Curt, WE7U ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > OpenSSH Development

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2005
Mark Janssen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Amateur Radio/FCC and the "none" encryption option

On 11/11/05, Curt, WE7U <archer@eskimo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Curt, WE7U wrote:
>
> > Is there an easy way to get the "none" option back into OpenSSH? In
> > order to do TCP/IP over amateur radio in the U.S. (and most other
> > countries) we must not use encryption to obscure the meaning of our
> > info, but we are allowed to use authentication to set up the links.

> Is there no answer back from the devel. team on this one? We've
> been struggling to keep this option compiled in and it's been
> getting harder to find old enough versions that the patches will
> apply to, and harder to compile such on newer systems.


Don't the high-performance networking patch guys also keep a none
option available. afaik they have working patches for the latest and
greatest openssh versions.

> I got one reply off-sig from someone who keeps newer patches
> available, but why should this be necessary? If there's a
> demonstrated need from some group of users can't this function be
> included in the sources as it used to be? It can be made more
> difficult to accidentally compile in as a default, perhaps a
> special #define or something that needs to be set or uncommented.


No comment here... developer decision ;) But I wouldn't mind if the
none version from hpn would be included... as long as it's never ever
used as a default :) and prints a huge warning if it ever is used
without some switch/configoption to disable the warning ;)

> Again, this is for use over amateur radio links, and the FCC doesn't
> allow us to encrypt over radio links. We're allowed to
> authenticate, but not encrypt the data over a link.


That sucks ;)

--
Mark Janssen -- maniac(at)maniac.nl -- pgp: 0x357D2178 | ,''`. |
Unix / Linux Open-Source and Internet Consultant @ Snow.nl | : :' : |
Maniac.nl MarkJanssen.nl NerdNet.nl Unix.nl | `. `' |
Skype: markmjanssen ICQ: 129696007 irc: FooBar on undernet | `- |

_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org
http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listi...enssh-unix-dev
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0