This is a discussion on Re: PKCS#11 support for openssh within the OpenSSH Development forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Dan C wrote: > Alon, that's great - thank you for the update. It works perfectly in > keeping with ...
|
|||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||
|
Dan C wrote:
> Alon, that's great - thank you for the update. It works perfectly in > keeping with the old OpenSC support, but with the added flexibility of > being able to use _any_ available PKCS#11 provider. A good improvement I > feel. > > My only remaining thoughts echo that of Andreas's, in that it would be > useful to have "direct" ssh(1) support. For both the ease of being able > to choose ie. "ssh -I0 <host>" when you wish, as well as being able to > hardset options to use card auth for specified hosts in ssh_config(5). > > Please feel free to pass my comments on to the list/Roumen/Andreas and > by all means throw any further testing my way. > > Regards, > Dan Hello Dan, I am glad that all works! I agree that there should be a simple way to use ssh with smartcard support... But I don't like current implementation in which the code is written twice, once for the agent and second for the ssh. I think that ssh should always use the agent, and if not available execute it (Or convert the agent to a library). Then ssh can read the config file and add identities as if the agent is external. This way the private key handling will be implemented in one place.... When I get some kind of positive response from the openssh developers, I will discuses what the user interface of the PKCS#11 support should be and implement a more friendly interface. Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listi...enssh-unix-dev |