Possible security flaw in OpenSSH and/or pam_krb5

This is a discussion on Possible security flaw in OpenSSH and/or pam_krb5 within the OpenSSH Development forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org kerberos@ncsa.uiuc.edu We believe there is a security flaw in either OpenSSH and/...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > OpenSSH Development

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2005
Mike Dopheide
 
Posts: n/a
Default Possible security flaw in OpenSSH and/or pam_krb5


openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org
kerberos@ncsa.uiuc.edu

We believe there is a security flaw in either OpenSSH and/or RedHat's pam_krb5
module. When a Kerberos principal has the REQUIRES_PWCHANGE
(+needchange) flag set, OpenSSH+pam_krb5 will still successfully
authenticate the user. Local 'su' and 'login' fail in this case which
leads us to believe it's at least partially a problem with OpenSSH's
PAM code.

We first noticed this flaw on SLES8 and verified the same problem on
RedHat 9 and RHEL 3.

RedHat 9 pam_krb5-1.60-1
RedHat Enterprise Linux AS 3 Update 5 pam_krb5-1.75-1
SuSE SLES 8 pam_krb5-1.0.3-199

Most of my work has been with RedHat 9 and I see the problem with
OpenSSH versions 3.7.1p2, 3.8.1p1, and 4.1p1.

Typically we try not to use pam_krb5, opting for native kerberos
authentication wherever possible. However, the ramification of this
problem is that accounts can still be used after we've 'expired' them
on the KDCs.

Last week (when we still thought it was solely a pam_krb5 issue) we
sent an email to some of the vendors. The only one who responded was
Nicolas Williams from Sun who has been very helpful. I'm not very
familiar with how PAM works or the OpenSSH codebase for that matter,
so I'm including some of his tips in case it helps in the
investigation of the problem:

------------------------------------------
- If the application is not calling, or ignoring non-success return
values of pam_acct_mgmt() yet still allowing access to the account,
then the application has a gaping hole and is at fault.

- A PAM module may defer authentication and authorization, in
password-change-required situations, to pam_sm_chauthtok(3PAM), but
if so it must: a) return PAM_SUCCESS from its
pam_sm_authenticate(3PAM) _AND_ b) return PAM_NEW_AUTHTOK_REQD from
its pam_sm_acct_mgmt(3PAM).

Kerberos V and LDAP BIND type modules typically do this.

If it does otherwise then it will either not support password aging
or sport a gaping security hole.

- Such modules' account modules must be configured as required or
requisite or binding.

- Care must be taken not to configure PAM account stacks in such a
way that another sufficient or binding module may preempt calls to
pam_sm_acct_mgmt(3PAM) entry points of modules such as pam_krb5.

------------------------------------------

We have not tested OpenSSH with PAM under Solaris.

If anyone has any questions regarding our setup I'll do my best to
answer them. We're hoping someone can duplicate the problem and we're
willing to test any fixes/patches that come up.

Thanks,
Mike

---------------------------------------------------
Mike Dopheide dopheide@ncsa.uiuc.edu
System Engineer Phone: 217.244.0299
NCSA, University of Illinois Fax: 217.244.1987

_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org
http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listi...enssh-unix-dev
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0