Re: Question performnace of SSH v1 vs SSH v2

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:09:34PM -0500, Michael A Stevens wrote:
> There also is a complication with just scaling the SSH window to a larger
> size because of a small bug in the channel code that grows a buffer to
> something larger than the buffer check allows. This really shouldn't
> happen though, as SSH should be able to depend on the underlying TCP
> buffer to hold data that it has not fetched yet.

If you have parallel streams, this will induce head-of-line blocking
(session of one stream sits in the TCP buffer, blocking stuff for
other channels).

gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org
http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listi...enssh-unix-dev