Re: Question performnace of SSH v1 vs SSH v2

This is a discussion on Re: Question performnace of SSH v1 vs SSH v2 within the OpenSSH Development forums, part of the Networking and Network Related category; Amba Giri wrote: > Hello > > I have ported OpenSSH 3.8p1 to a LynxOS platform. Recently I heard ...


Go Back   Usenet Forums > Networking and Network Related > OpenSSH Development

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2005
Damien Miller
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Question performnace of SSH v1 vs SSH v2

Amba Giri wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have ported OpenSSH 3.8p1 to a LynxOS platform. Recently I heard a
> report from the field that v2 is perceived to be significantly slower
> than v1. Is this a known issue? Are there any configuration parameters
> that can be modified to make v2 faster?


Protocol 2 is slower because it includes a real per-packet MAC instead
of a weak checksum. You can save some overhead by using a truncated MAC
like hmac-sha1-96, but there is always going to be more work per packet.

I have looked at implementing AES CCM, which could be much faster,
particularly on platforms with AES implemented in CPU instructions, but
it doesn't fit nicely in the cipher and MAC negotiation mechanism.

-d

_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org
http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listi...enssh-unix-dev
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0